首页> 外文期刊>American journal of therapeutics >Drug and device trials: should we ask more.
【24h】

Drug and device trials: should we ask more.

机译:药物和器械试验:我们还应该提出更多要求。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Drug and Device development are often different, especially since a device is frequently modified, while once a drug enters clinical trials its chemical composition remains constant. Additionally, device therapy is often impossible to blind without using techniques such as sham procedures, which can be ethically unacceptable. This inability to blind a procedure and the need to compare to an alternative therapy often leads to non inferiority studies. While non inferiority studies are more difficult to design, they are useful and can effectively evaluate one therapeutic approach over another. While some argue for superiority trials, it is incorrect to believe an intervention must be superior to another to be approvable by a regulatory body or used by clinicians.
机译:药物和器械的开发通常会有所不同,尤其是由于器械经常被修改,而一旦药物进入临床试验,其化学成分就会保持不变。另外,如果不使用假手术之类的技术,设备疗法通常是不可能盲目的,这在伦理上是不可接受的。这种无视手术的盲目性以及与替代疗法进行比较的需求通常会导致非自卑性研究。尽管非劣效性研究较难设计,但它们很有用,可以有效地评估一种治疗方法。尽管有些人主张进行优越性试验,但认为干预措施必须优于另一项措施才能获得监管机构的批准或临床医生的使用是不正确的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号