...
首页> 外文期刊>Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental. >Effectiveness of Hydrochlorothiazide in Combination with Telmisartan and Olmesartan in Adults with Moderate Hypertension Not Controlled with Monotherapy: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Blinded End Point (PROBE), Parallel-Arm Study
【24h】

Effectiveness of Hydrochlorothiazide in Combination with Telmisartan and Olmesartan in Adults with Moderate Hypertension Not Controlled with Monotherapy: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Blinded End Point (PROBE), Parallel-Arm Study

机译:氢氯噻嗪与替米沙坦和奥美沙坦联用在未接受单药治疗的中度高血压成人中的有效性:一项前瞻性,随机,开放标签,盲目的终点(PROBE),平行臂研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The potential combinations of antihypertensive agents are many, and making rational choices depends on the characteristics of each drug and on their complementary mechanisms of action.OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of adding hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg to olmesartan 20 mg or telmisartan 80 mg on blood pressure (BP) in patients with moderate hypertension.M ETHODS: Consecutive outpatients at the Centro per I'Ipertensione e la Fisiopatologia Cardiovascolare, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy, of both sexes aged 39 to 75 years were considered eligible for enrollment if they had a sitting diastolic BP (DBP) >99 mm Hg and <110 mm Hg at the end of an initial 2-week washout period. Patients were randomized to olmesartan 20 mg QD or telmisartan 80 mg QD according to a prospective, open-label, blinded end point, parallel-arm design. After 8 weeks of monotherapy, patients whose BP was not controlled (DBP >90 mm Hg) received HCTZ 12.5 mg QD for 8 additional weeks. Clinical and ambulatory BPs were measured at the end of the washout period and at the end of both treatment periods. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded from spontaneous reports and direct inquiry from investigators.RESULTS: One hundred forty-five patients, all of whom were white, were recruited for the study. After the initial washout period, 13 patients did not meet the inclusion criteria and 6 refused to continue. A total of 126 white patients (69 men, 57 women; mean [SDJ age, 60.2 [11.6] years) were randomized to receive monotherapy. Of these, 35 patients (56%) in the olmesartan group and 33 (52%) in the telmisartan group had previously received antihypertensive therapy. At the end of monotherapy, the 52 patients in the olmesartan group and the 49 patients in the telmisartan treatment group who were still in the study and had their BP inadequately controlled by treatment had HCTZ 12.5 mg QD added to their treatment regimen. Both combinations induced a greater ambulatory mean (SD) systolic BP (SBP) and DBP reduction than monothera-py (SBP: 145.3 [6.1] in the olmesartan group and 140.1 {6.4} in the telmisartan group, P < 0.05; DBP: 88.1 [5.1] in the olmesartan group and 84.9 {4.9} in the telmisartan group, P < 0.05). The mean (SD) reduction from baseline in the telmisartan/HCTZ-treated patients (21.5 {10.1}/l4.6 [5.2} mm Hg for 24 hours, 21.8 [1O.2}/14.9 [5.2} mm Hg for daytime, and 20.4 [1O.3}/13.7 [5.9} mm Hg for nighttime; all, P < 0.001 vs baseline) was significantly greater than that observed in the olmesartan/HCTZ-treated patients (18.8 [9.8]/12.3 [4.9} mm Hg for 24 hours, 19-3 [9.8}/12.8 {4.9} mm Hg for daytime, and 17.4 [10.2}/10.6 [5.5] mm Hg for nighttime; all, P < 0.001 vs baseline), with a significant difference between the 2 treatment groups (P < 0.01). Compared with mono-therapy, the add-on effect of HCTZ 12.5 rng QD administration was significantly greater in the telmisartan group than in the olmesartan group (P < 0.05); the difference being more evident for nighttime BP values (SBP, P = 0.031; DBP, P = 0.025). Reported AEs were similar in the olmesartan/HCTZ and the telmisartan/HCTZ groups (4 patients [7%} vs 3 patients [6%]).Conclusion: The addition of HCTZ 12.5 mg to telmisartan 80 mg monothera-py was associated with greater BP reduction than the addition of the same dose of HCTZ to olmesartan 20 mg monotherapy in these patients previously uncontrolled on monotherapy.
机译:背景:降压药的潜在组合很多,根据每种药物的特性及其互补的作用机制做出合理的选择。目的:本研究的目的是评估添加12.5 mg氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)的有效性ETHODS:意大利帕维亚大学帕维亚大学心肺血管中心中心的连续门诊患者,年龄均在39岁左右如果最初2周的冲洗期结束时他们的舒张压BP(DBP)> 99 mm Hg和<110 mm Hg,则认为75至75岁的患者符合入组条件。根据前瞻性,开放标签,盲点,平行臂设计,将患者随机分为奥美沙坦20 mg QD或替米沙坦80 mg QD。单一疗法治疗8周后,血压不受控制(DBP> 90 mm Hg)的患者又接受了HCTZ 12.5 mg QD,持续了8周。在冲洗期结束时和两个治疗期结束时均测量临床和门诊血压。通过自发报告和研究者的直接询问记录不良事件(AEs)。结果:招募了一百四十五名均为白人的患者进行研究。在初始冲洗期后,有13例患者不符合纳入标准,其中6例拒绝继续治疗。共有126名白人患者(男69例,女57例;平均[SDJ年龄,60.2 [11.6]岁)被随机分配接受单药治疗。其中,奥美沙坦组35例(56%)和替米沙坦组33例(52%)以前曾接受过降压治疗。在单药治疗结束时,奥美沙坦组的52例患者和替米沙坦治疗组的49例仍在研究中,并且其BP受治疗控制不力的患者在治疗方案中添加了HCTZ 12.5 mg QD。两种组合相比单药治疗均引起更大的门诊平均收缩压(SD)和DBP降低(奥美沙坦组为SBP:145.3 [6.1],替米沙坦组为140.1 {6.4},P <0.05; DBP:88.1奥美沙坦组为[5.1],替米沙坦组为84.9 {4.9},P <0.05)。替米沙坦/ HCTZ治疗患者的平均(SD)降低量(24小时为21.5 {10.1} /l4.6 [5.2} mm Hg,白天为21.8 [1O.2} /14.9 [5.2} mm Hg,和夜间的20.4 [1O.3} /13.7 [5.9} mm Hg;全部,与基线相比,P <0.001)显着大于接受奥美沙坦/ HCTZ治疗的患者的观察值(18.8 [9.8] /12.3 [4.9} mm 24小时汞柱,白天19-3 [9.8} /12.8 {4.9}毫米汞柱,夜间17.4 [10.2} /10.6 [5.5]毫米汞柱;全部,与基线相比P <0.001),两者之间有显着差异2个治疗组(P <0.01)。与单一疗法相比,替米沙坦组给予HCTZ 12.5 rng QD的附加效果显着大于奥美沙坦组(P <0.05)。夜间BP值的差异更明显(SBP,P = 0.031; DBP,P = 0.025)。在奥美沙坦/ HCTZ和替米沙坦/ HCTZ组中,报告的不良事件相似(4例[7%]对3例[6%])。结论:替米沙坦80 mg单药治疗增加了12.5 mg HCTZ与更高的剂量相关在以前无法通过单一疗法控制的这些患者中,与在奥美沙坦20 mg单一疗法中添加相同剂量的HCTZ相比,血压降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号