...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The official journal of the National Kidney Foundation >Nonreferral and nonacceptance to dialysis by primary care physicians and nephrologists in Canada and the United States.
【24h】

Nonreferral and nonacceptance to dialysis by primary care physicians and nephrologists in Canada and the United States.

机译:加拿大和美国的初级保健医生和肾脏病医生不推荐和不接受透析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Research from Canada and the United States suggests that not offering dialysis to patients who might benefit still occurs. This study was conducted to investigate nonreferral and nonacceptance to dialysis by primary care physicians (PCPs) and nephrologists in these countries. We surveyed a random sample of Canadian and US PCPs and nephrologists concerning their attitudes toward and experience with withholding dialysis in patients with advanced chronic renal failure. In response to a question about whether the physician believes there should be an age beyond which dialysis should not be offered, 12% of Canadian PCPs, 20% of US PCPs, 4% of Canadian nephrologists, and 9% of US nephrologists answered yes. When asked about their recommendations concerning dialysis initiation in 10 vignettes of patients with impending end-stage renal disease (ESRD), the responses of Canadian and US physicians were similar. PCPs compared with nephrologists were less likely to recommend dialysis in cases with physical illnesses and more likely to recommend it in cases with neuropsychiatric impairments. Over a 3-year period, 13% of Canadian PCPs and 19% of US PCPs reported nonreferral to dialysis at least once. Withholding rates were 25% for Canadian PCPs, 16% for US PCPs, 13% for Canadian nephrologists, and 17% for US nephrologists. We conclude that although nonreferral of patients who might benefit from dialysis still occurs, it does not seem to be common, and the attitudes of Canadian and US physicians toward this issue are similar and could not entirely account for the much greater incidence of treated ESRD in the United States. PCPs and nephrologists should continue to be educated about the modern criteria for patient selection for dialysis.
机译:加拿大和美国的研究表明,仍然没有为可能受益的患者提供透析服务。这项研究的目的是调查这些国家/地区的初级保健医生(PCP)和肾病医生对透析的不推荐和不接受。我们对加拿大和美国的PCP和肾脏病医生进行了随机抽样调查,以了解他们对晚期慢性肾衰竭患者拒绝透析的态度和经验。在回答有关医生是否认为应该在不超过透析年龄的问题时,加拿大PCPs的12%,美国PCPs的20%,加拿大肾病专家的4%和美国肾病专家的9%回答是。当被问及有关在即将发生的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者的10个小插图中开始透析的建议时,加拿大和美国医生的反应相似。与身体科医生相比,PCP与肾脏病医师相比不太可能建议透析,而在神经精神病患者中则更可能建议透析。在三年的时间里,有13%的加拿大PCP和19%的美国PCP报告至少一次不推荐透析。加拿大五氯苯酚的预扣税率为25%,美国五氯苯酚的预扣税率为16%,加拿大肾脏科医师的为13%,美国肾脏科医师为17%。我们得出的结论是,尽管仍然存在无法推荐可能从透析中受益的患者的情况,但这种情况似乎并不普遍,加拿大和美国医生对此问题的态度相似,不能完全说明接受治疗的ESRD发生率高得多。美国。应继续对PCP和肾病学家进行有关选择患者进行透析的现代标准的教育。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号