首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The official journal of the National Kidney Foundation >Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD receiving dialysis: A 54-week randomized trial
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD receiving dialysis: A 54-week randomized trial

机译:西他列汀在2型糖尿病和ESRD接受透析的患者中的疗效和安全性:一项为期54周的随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Treatment with oral antihyperglycemic agents has not been well characterized in patients with type 2 diabetes and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The efficacy and safety of sitagliptin and glipizide monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD on dialysis therapy were assessed in this study. Study Design: 54-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm study. Setting & Participants: From 31 clinical sites in 12 countries, 129 patients 30 years or older with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were on dialysis therapy and had a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 7%-9% were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment. Intervention: Monotherapy with sitagliptin, 25 mg daily or glipizide (initiated with 2.5 mg daily and titrated up to a potential maximum dose of 10 mg twice daily or down to avoid hypoglycemia). Outcomes: Primary end points were 54-week change in HbA1c level from baseline and tolerability with sitagliptin. A secondary end point was the comparison of sitagliptin versus glipizide on the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia. Results: Of 129 patients randomly assigned, 64 were in the sitagliptin group (mean baseline age, 61 years; HbA1c, 7.9%) and 65 were in the glipizide group (mean baseline age, 59 years; HbA1c, 7.8%). After 54 weeks, the least squares mean change from baseline in HbA 1c level was -0.72% (95% CI, -0.95% to -0.48%) with sitagliptin and -0.87% (95% CI, -1.11% to -0.63%) with glipizide, for a difference of 0.15% (95% CI, -0.18% to 0.49%). The incidences of symptomatic hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia were 6.3% versus 10.8% (between-group difference, -4.8% [95% CI, -15.7% to 5.6%]) and 0% versus 7.7% (between-group difference, -7.8% [95% CI, -17.1% to -1.9%]) in the sitagliptin and glipizide groups, respectively. Higher incidences (ie, 95% CI around between-treatment difference excluded 0) of cellulitis and headache were found with sitagliptin compared to glipizide (6.3% vs 0%, respectively, for both). Limitations: Small sample size limits between-group comparisons. Conclusions: Treatment with sitagliptin or glipizide monotherapy was effective and well tolerated over 54 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were receiving dialysis.
机译:背景:在2型糖尿病和终末期肾脏疾病(ESRD)的患者中,口服降糖药的治疗尚无很好的特征。本研究评估了西他列汀和格列吡嗪单一疗法在2型糖尿病和ESRD患者透析治疗中的疗效和安全性。研究设计:54周,随机,双盲,平行研究。参与者:来自12个国家/地区的31个临床场所,接受透析治疗且血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)水平为7%-9%的129名30岁或以上的2型糖尿病和ESRD患者按1:1比例随机分配去治疗。干预:单药西格列汀,每天25 mg或格列吡嗪(每天2.5 mg,并逐渐增加剂量至最大最大剂量10 mg,每天两次或向下,以避免低血糖)。结果:主要终点是HbA1c水平较基线水平和西他列汀耐受性变化54周。次要终点是西格列汀和格列吡嗪对有症状的低血糖发生率的比较。结果:在随机分配的129例患者中,西他列汀组64例(平均基线年龄61岁; HbA1c,7.9%),格列吡嗪组65例(平均基线年龄59岁; HbA1c,7.8%)。 54周后,使用西他列汀的HbA 1c水平与基线的最小二乘平均变化为-0.72%(95%CI,-0.95%至-0.48%)和-0.87%(95%CI,-1.11%至-0.63%) )与格列吡嗪,差异为0.15%(95%CI,-0.18%至0.49%)。症状性低血糖和严重低血糖的发生率分别为6.3%和10.8%(组间差异,-4.8%[95%CI,-15.7%至5.6%])和0%和7.7%(组间差异,-7.8)西他列汀组和格列吡嗪组分别占50%CI [95%CI,-17.1%至-1.9%]。与格列吡嗪相比,西他列汀组发生蜂窝组织炎和头痛的发生率更高(即,治疗间差异附近的CI为95%,排除0),两者的发生率分别为6.3%和0%。局限性:小样本数量限制了组间比较。结论:西他列汀或格列吡嗪单药治疗在接受透析的2型糖尿病和ESRD患者中有效且耐受54周以上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号