首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The official journal of the National Kidney Foundation >A systematic review of kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors.
【24h】

A systematic review of kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors.

机译:扩展标准供体的肾脏移植的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: During the past few years, there has been renewed interest in the use of expanded criteria donors (ECD) for kidney transplantation to increase the numbers of deceased donor kidneys available. More kidney transplants would result in shorter waiting times and limit the morbidity and mortality associated with long-term dialysis therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of the literature. SETTING & POPULATION: Kidney transplantation population. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: Studies were identified by using a comprehensive search through MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Inclusion criteria were case series, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials assessing kidney transplantation in adult recipients using ECDs. PREDICTOR: A special focus was given to studies comparing the evolution of kidney transplantation between standard criteria donors (defined as a donor who does not meet criteria for donation after cardiac death or ECD) and ECDs (defined as any brain-dead donor aged > 60 years or a donor aged > 50 years with 2 of the following conditions: history of hypertension, terminal serum creatinine level >or= 1.5 mg/dL, or death resulting from a cerebrovascular accident). OUTCOMES: Criteria used to define and select ECDs, practice patterns, long-term outcomes, early complications, and some patient issues, such as selection criteria and immunosuppressive management. RESULTS: ECD kidneys have worse long-term survival than standard criteria donor kidneys. The optimal ECD kidney for donation depends on adequate glomerular filtration rate and acceptable donor kidney histological characteristics, albeit the usefulness of biopsy is debated. LIMITATIONS: This review is based mainly on data from observational studies, and varying amounts of bias could be present. We did not attempt to quantitatively analyze the effect of ECD kidneys on kidney transplantation because of the huge heterogeneity found in study designs and definitions of ECD. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, we conclude that patients younger than 40 years or scheduled for kidney retransplantation should not receive an ECD kidney. Patients 40 years or older, especially with diabetic nephropathy or nondiabetic disease, but a long expected waiting time for kidney transplantation, show better survival receiving an ECD kidney than remaining on dialysis therapy.
机译:背景:在过去的几年中,人们开始对使用扩大标准的供体(ECD)进行肾脏移植以增加可用的已故供体肾脏数量产生了新的兴趣。更多的肾脏移植将导致更短的等待时间,并限制与长期透析治疗相关的发病率和死亡率。研究设计:对文献的系统评价。地点和人口:肾脏移植人群。研究的选择标准:通过对MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库的全面搜索来确定研究。纳入标准为病例系列研究,队列研究和评估使用ECD在成年接受者中进行肾脏移植的随机对照试验。预测:特别关注标准比较标准的捐献者(定义为心脏死亡或ECD后不符合捐献标准的捐献者)与ECDs(定义为年龄> 60岁的任何脑死亡捐献者)之间肾脏移植的发展比较研究年或年龄大于50岁的供体,且患有以下两种情况:高血压病史,终末血清肌酐水平≥1.5mg / dL或因脑血管意外死亡。结果:用于定义和选择ECD,实践模式,长期结果,早期并发症和某些患者问题的标准,例如选择标准和免疫抑制管理。结果:ECD肾脏的长期存活率比标准标准供体肾脏差。最佳的ECD肾脏捐献取决于适当的肾小球滤过率和可接受的捐献者肾脏组织学特征,尽管对活检的有用性存在争议。局限性:本评价主要基于观察研究的数据,并且可能存在不同程度的偏见。由于在ECD的研究设计和定义中发现了巨大的异质性,因此我们没有尝试定量分析ECD肾脏对肾脏移植的影响。结论:基于现有证据,我们得出结论,年龄小于40岁或计划进行肾脏移植的患者不应接受ECD肾脏。 40岁或40岁以上的患者,特别是患有糖尿病肾病或非糖尿病疾病,但预期肾脏移植的等待时间长的患者,接受ECD肾脏的存活率要高于接受透析治疗的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号