首页> 外文期刊>核医学 >Assessment of biventricular function using gated blood pool SPECT with QBS software: comparison with planar radionuclide ventriculography
【24h】

Assessment of biventricular function using gated blood pool SPECT with QBS software: comparison with planar radionuclide ventriculography

机译:使用与QBS软件的门控血池SPECT评估双心功能:与平面放射性核素脑室的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Quantitative blood pool SPECT (QBS) is a new application for the quantitative assessment of biventricular function from gated blood pool SPECT (TMUGA). In this study, we compared biventricular function between planar radionuclide ventriculography and TMUGA. The reproducibility of measuring biventricular ejection fraction with QBS was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients with cardiac disease were enrolled. Following intravenous bolus injection of 740 MBq of 99mTc human serum albumin-DTPA, first-pass radionuclide angiography (FP) and 25-gated interval planar multi-gated blood pool scintigraphy (PMUGA) were performed for the measurement of right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF; %) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; %), respectively. Subsequently TMUGA data set was acquired with a dual-head gamma camera (16 gated intervals). Then, alternative LVEF and RVEF were measured using TMUGA with QBS. Regional left ventricular wall motion for both PMUGA and TMUGA were assessed with a 4-point scoring system respectively. RESULTS: Automatic biventricular border detection using QBS was feasible in 27 of 35 patients (70.7%). Measurements of TMUGA LVEF and RVEF were well reproducible, with interobserver correlation coefficient of 0.98 and 0.97, respectively. TMUGA LVEF showed excellent correlation with PMUGA LVEF (r = 0.98, SEE = 3.92%). The agreement of LV wall motion score between TMUGA and PMUGA was 88.1% (214 of 243 segments), with a kappa value of 0.82. On the other hand, RVEF determined by QBS had a 12.4% average overestimate compared to the same value obtained by FP. Moreover 95% confidential interval of TMUGA RVEF (-28.8 to +4.0%) was wider than that of TMUGA LVEF (-10.7 to +10.7%). CONCLUSION: TMUGA with QBS analysis provided accurate and reproducible data for global and regional left ventricular function. However, the results of RVEF with TMUGA were not satisfying as a replacement for those with FP and modifying the algorithm were needed to improve accuracy of quantification.
机译:定量血液池SPECT(QBS)是从门控血液池SPECT(TMUGA)的多币功能定量评估的新应用。在这项研究中,我们比较了平面放射性核素脑室和TMUGA之间的双心功能。还评价了用QBS测量前型喷射级分的再现性。材料和方法:招收了35例心脏病患者。静脉注射血清注射740 MBQ的99MTC人血清白蛋白-DTPA,进行一级放射性核素血管造影(FP)和25门控间隔平面的多门控血液池闪烁(PMUGA)用于测量右心室喷射部分(RVEF %)和左心室喷射分数(LVEF;%)。随后使用双头伽马摄像机(16个门控间隔)获取TMuga数据集。然后,使用带QBS的TMUGA测量替代的LVEF和RVEF。分别用4点评分系统评估PMUGA和TMUGA的区域左心室壁运动。结果:35名患者中的27例(70.7%),使用qbs自动使用qbs的自动边界检测可行。 TMUGA LVEF和RVEF的测量很好地可重复,间隔传感器相关系数分别为0.98和0.97。 TMUGA LVEF与PMUGA LVEF(R = 0.98 = 3.92%)显示出优异的相关性。 TMuga和PMUGA之间的LV壁运动评分的协议为88.1%(243个部分中的214个),Kappa值为0.82。另一方面,与通过FP获得的相同值相比,由QBS确定的RVEF具有12.4%的平均估计率。此外,TMUGA RVEF(-28.8至+ 4.0%)的95%机密间隔越宽于TMUGA LVEF(-10.7至+ 10.7%)。结论:TMUGA具有QBS分析为全球和区域左心室功能提供了准确和可重复的数据。然而,具有TMUGA的RVEF的结果不符合FP的替代品,并且需要修改算法以提高量化的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号