...
首页> 外文期刊>Aging & mental health >Ethics of using assistive technology in the care for community-dwelling elderly people: an overview of the literature.
【24h】

Ethics of using assistive technology in the care for community-dwelling elderly people: an overview of the literature.

机译:在社区居民中使用辅助技术的伦理:文献综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: This article provides an overview of the international literature on the most important ethical considerations in the field of assistive technology (AT) in the care for community-dwelling elderly people, focused on dementia. METHOD: A systematic literature review was performed. RESULTS: A total of 46 papers met the inclusion criteria. Three main themes were found. The first theme, personal living environment, involves the subthemes privacy, autonomy and obtrusiveness. The second theme, the outside world, involves the subthemes stigma and human contact. The third theme, the design of AT devices, involves the subthemes individual approach, affordability and safety. The often referred to umbrella term of 'obtrusiveness' is frequently used by many authors in the discussion, while a clear description of the concept is mostly absent. CONCLUSION: When it comes to AT use in the care for elderly people living at home, ethical debate appears not to be a priority. The little discussion there relies heavily on thick concepts such as autonomy and obtrusiveness which seem to complicate the debate rather than clarify it, because they contain many underlying ambiguous concepts and assumptions. Most encountered ethical objections originate from the view that people are, or should be, independent and self-determinant. It is questionable whether the view is correct and helpful in the debate on AT use in the care for (frail) elderly people. Other ethical approaches that view people as social and reciprocal might be more applicable and shed a different light on the ethical aspects of AT use.
机译:目的:本文概述了国际文献中有关在社区老人护理中辅助技术(AT)领域中最重要的伦理考虑因素,重点是痴呆症。方法:进行系统的文献综述。结果:共有46篇论文符合入选标准。找到了三个主要主题。第一个主题是个人生活环境,涉及以下子主题:隐私,自主权和强迫性。第二个主题是外部世界,涉及子主题耻辱和人类接触。第三个主题是AT设备的设计,涉及各个子主题的个性化方法,可负担性和安全性。在讨论中,许多作者经常使用通常被称为“引人入胜”的概括性术语,而几乎没有对该概念的清晰描述。结论:在用于在家中老年人的护理中使用AT时,道德辩论似乎并不是优先考虑的事情。那里的小讨论很大程度上依赖于诸如自治和强迫性之类的厚重概念,这些概念似乎使辩论变得复杂而不是澄清它,因为它们包含许多潜在的模棱两可的概念和假设。多数遇到的道德异议均源于人们是或应该是独立自主的观点。对于在(脆弱的)老年人护理中使用AT的争论,这种观点是否正确并有帮助尚有疑问。将人视为社交和互惠的其他道德方法可能更适用,并且对AT使用的道德方面有不同的了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号