...
首页> 外文期刊>Allergy >House dust mite control measures for asthma: systematic review.
【24h】

House dust mite control measures for asthma: systematic review.

机译:屋尘螨控制哮喘的措施:系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The major allergen in house dust comes from mites. We performed a systematic review of the randomized trials that had assessed the effects of reducing exposure to house dust mite antigens in the homes of people with mite-sensitive asthma, and had compared active interventions with placebo or no treatment. Fifty-four trials (3002 patients) were included. Thirty-six trials assessed physical methods (26 mattress covers), 10 chemical methods and eight a combination of chemical and physical methods. Despite the fact that many trials were of poor quality and would be expected to exaggerate the reported effect, we did not find an effect of the interventions. For the most frequently reported outcome, peak flow in the morning (1565 patients), the standardized mean difference was 0.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.10 to 0.10). There were no statistically significant differences in number of patients improved (relative risk 1.01, 95% CI 0.80-1.27), asthma symptom scores (standardized mean difference -0.04, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.07) or in medication usage (standardized mean difference -0.06, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.07). Chemical and physical methods aimed at reducing exposure to house dust mite allergens cannot be recommended.
机译:房屋灰尘中的主要过敏原来自螨虫。我们对随机试验进行了系统评价,评估了减少螨虫敏感性哮喘患者家中屋尘螨抗原暴露的效果,并将主动干预与安慰剂或未治疗进行了比较。包括五十四项试验(3002例患者)。 36项试验评估了物理方法(26种床垫套),10种化学方法以及8种化学和物理方法的组合。尽管许多试验的质量较差,并且预计会夸大报道的作用,但我们并未发现干预措施的作用。对于最常报告的结局,早上的峰值流量(1565名患者),标准均值差为0.00(95%置信区间(CI)-0.10至0.10)。改善的患者数量(相对危险度1.01,95%CI 0.80-1.27),哮喘症状评分(标准平均差异-0.04、95%CI -0.15至0.07)或药物使用(标准平均差异)均无统计学差异。 -0.06,95%CI -0.18至0.07)。不建议使用旨在减少室内尘螨过敏原暴露的化学和物理方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号