...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Preventive Medicine >Rural-urban differences in injury hospitalizations in the U.S., 2004.
【24h】

Rural-urban differences in injury hospitalizations in the U.S., 2004.

机译:美国,2004年受伤住院的城乡差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Despite prior research demonstrating higher injury-mortality rates among rural populations, few studies have examined the differences in nonfatal injury risk between rural and urban populations. The objective of this study was to compare injury-hospitalization rates between rural and urban populations using population-based national estimates derived from patient-encounter data. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of the 2004 Nationwide Inpatient Sample was conducted in 2007. Rural-urban classifications were determined based on residence. SUDAAN software and U.S. Census population estimates were used to calculate nationally representative injury-hospitalization rates. Injury rates between rural and urban categories were compared with rate ratios and 95% CIs. RESULTS: An estimated 1.9 million (95% CI=1,800,250-1,997,801) injury-related hospitalizations were identified. Overall, injury-hospitalization rates generally increased with increasing rurality; rates were 27% higher in large rural counties (95% CI=10%, 44%) and 35% higher in small rural counties (95% CI=16%, 55%). While hospitalization rates for assaults were highest in large urban counties, the rates for unintentional injuries from motor vehicle traffic, falls, and poisonings were higher in rural populations. Rates for self-inflicted injuries from poisonings, cuttings, and firearms were higher in rural counties. The total estimated hospital charges for injuries were more than Dollars 50 billion. On a per-capita basis, hospital charges were highest for rural populations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the substantial burden imposed by injury on the U.S. population and the significantly increased risk for those residing in rural locations. Prevention and intervention efforts in rural areas should be expanded and should focus on risk factors unique to these populations.
机译:背景:尽管先前的研究表明农村人口的致死率更高,但很少有研究检验城乡人口非致命性伤害风险的差异。这项研究的目的是使用从患者相遇数据得出的以人口为基础的国家估计数,比较城乡人口之间的伤害医院住院率。方法:2007年对2004年全国住院患者样本进行了横断面分析。根据居住地确定了城乡分类。使用SUDAAN软件和美国人口普查人口估算值来计算全国代表性的伤害住院率。将城乡类别之间的伤害率与比率和95%CI进行比较。结果:确定了约190万例(95%CI = 1,800,250-1,997,801)与伤害相关的住院治疗。总体而言,随着农村人口的增加,伤病住院率普遍增加。大型农村县的比率高出27%(95%CI = 10%,44%),而小型农村县则高35%(95%CI = 16%,55%)。虽然袭击的住院率在大城市县中最高,但农村人口中因机动车通行,摔倒和中毒造成的意外伤害发生率更高。在农村县,中毒,cutting割和枪支造成的自我伤害伤害发生率较高。估计的受伤医院总费用超过500亿美元。按人均计算,农村人口的医院费用最高。结论:这些发现凸显了受伤对美国人口造成的沉重负担,以及农村地区居民的显着增加的风险。应扩大农村地区的预防和干预工作,并应将重点放在这些人群特有的危险因素上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号