...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Preventive Medicine >Effectiveness of health promotion programs to increase motor vehicle occupant restraint use among young children.
【24h】

Effectiveness of health promotion programs to increase motor vehicle occupant restraint use among young children.

机译:健康促进计划的有效性,以增加幼儿中乘员约束的使用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To review the effectiveness of nonlegislative community and clinical programs to increase the rate of child motor vehicle occupant restraint use among children under the age of 5 years. METHOD: This was a systematic review of the world's published literature. The Cochrane Collaboration protocol was used to conduct the literature search. The following databases were searched for literature on this topic: MEDLINE, EMBASE, NTIS, PsychINFO, ERIC, Nursing and Allied Health, Transportation Research and Information Service, and EI Compendex. The bibliographies of relevant publications were used to search for additional references. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were included if they evaluated a clinical or community-based intervention designed to increase the use child restraint devices among motor vehicle passengers under the age of 5 years. Studies of the effects of legislation or law enforcement programs were excluded. All study design types, including randomized controlled trials, controlled trials, and controlled or uncontrolled pre/post evaluations, were included. Studies were excluded if there was either no control group or no baseline data with which to compare outcome data. Studies were also excluded if they did not use observed restraint use as at least one of the outcome measures. DATA COLLECTION: Each study was reviewed in depth with special attention to the strength of study design. Outcomes were assessed in terms of the absolute difference in observed restraint use within and/or between groups across study intervals. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies met inclusion criteria for in-depth review. Pooling of results was not possible because of the large differences between studies with regard to study design, settings, target groups, intervention methods, and units of analysis. There were a total of three randomized controlled trials, four controlled trials without random individual or group assignment, three controlled pre-post evaluations, and eight uncontrolled pre/post studies. Among preschool programs, short-term absolute percentage point gains in seat belt use rates ranged from 12% to 52% but only from 8% to 14% one month or more after the intervention. Among community-based media campaigns, long-term child restraint use increased by an absolute margin of 5% to 14%. Of the eleven peri-partum counseling programs, long-term follow-up revealed gains of 6% to 27% with most between 10% to 15%. Many studies had serious design flaws that could overestimate the magnitude of the effect. CONCLUSIONS: Programs to increase the rate of child restraint use among child occupants of motor vehicles appear to have overall moderate short-term effectiveness. The magnitude of the positive program effects one or more months after the intervention appear to diminish substantially. There is a strong need for high quality randomized controlled trials to determine the long-term effectiveness of child restraint promotion programs.
机译:目的:回顾非立法社区和临床计划在提高5岁以下儿童中使用儿童乘员约束的比例的有效性。方法:这是对世界已出版文献的系统评价。使用Cochrane协作协议进行文献检索。在以下数据库中搜索有关该主题的文献:MEDLINE,EMBASE,NTIS,PsychINFO,ERIC,护理和相关健康,运输研究与信息服务以及EI Compendex。有关出版物的参考书目用于搜索其他参考文献。选择标准:如果研究评估了旨在增加5岁以下机动车乘客使用儿童约束装置的临床或社区干预措施,则纳入研究。立法或执法计划效果的研究被排除在外。包括所有研究设计类型,包括随机对照试验,对照试验以及对照或非对照前/后评估。如果没有对照组或没有基线数据可与结果数据进行比较,则排除研究。如果研究未将观察到的约束作为至少一项结局指标,则也将其排除在外。数据收集:每个研究均进行了深入审查,并特别注意研究设计的强度。根据研究间隔内和/或组之间观察到的约束使用的绝对差异评估结果。结果:共有18项研究符合纳入标准进行深入审查。由于研究之间在研究设计,设置,目标人群,干预方法和分析单位方面存在很大差异,因此无法汇总结果。总共有三项随机对照试验,四项无随机个体或小组分配的对照试验,三项对照的事前评估和八项非对照的事前/事后研究。在学前班计划中,干预后一个月或更长时间,安全带使用率的短期绝对百分比提高幅度为12%至52%,但仅为8%至14%。在以社区为基础的媒体运动中,长期使用儿童约束装置绝对增加了5%至14%。在这11项围产期咨询计划中,长期随访显示获益在6%至27%之间,大部分在10%至15%之间。许多研究存在严重的设计缺陷,可能会高估影响的程度。结论:提高机动车儿童乘员使用儿童约束装置的方案似乎总体上具有短期的有效性。干预后一个或多个月,积极计划效果的程度似乎大大降低了。迫切需要高质量的随机对照试验来确定儿童约束促进计划的长期有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号