首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Surgical Oncology >Comparison of open and closed abdomen techniques for the delivery of intraperitoneal pemetrexed using a murine model
【24h】

Comparison of open and closed abdomen techniques for the delivery of intraperitoneal pemetrexed using a murine model

机译:使用小鼠模型对腹膜内卵筛网递送的开放和闭腹部技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background and Objectives Pemetrexed is an appealing agent to use for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). However, the optimal method of pemetrexed delivery still remains undefined. Using a murine model, we compared the use of open and closed abdomen techniques on the absorption of intraperitoneal (IP) pemetrexed in different compartments. Methods Eleven Sprague‐Dawley rats were submitted to a fixed dose of IP pemetrexed (1000?mg/m 2 ) at a perfusion temperature of 40°C during 25?min according to two techniques: open and closed. At the end of perfusion, samples in different compartments were harvested and the concentrations of pemetrexed were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. Results Absorption of IP pemetrexed in portal and systemic blood was significantly higher using the open compared to the closed abdomen technique (93.17 vs 52.50?μg/mL, P ??0.001) and (76.26 vs 51.65?μg/mL, P ??0.001), respectively. No difference was found between the two techniques on the peritoneal tissue concentration of pemetrexed (18.07 vs 19.17?μg/g, P ?=?0.51). Conclusion Peritoneal absorption of pemetrexed is not modified by the use of either technique. However, systemic concentrations of pemetrexed increased using the open technique, suggesting it could increase systemic toxicity.
机译:背景和目标Pemetrexed是用于具有高温腹膜内化疗(HIPEC)的细胞导致手术的吸引力。然而,Pemetrexed交付的最佳方法仍然仍未确定。使用鼠模型,我们比较了在不同隔室中的腹膜内(IP)腹膜内(IP)的吸收的使用。方法根据两种技术在25°C期间,11种Sprague-Dawley大鼠在25℃的灌注温度下在25°C的固定剂量的IP Pemetrexed(1000×Mg / m 2)中,根据两种技术:打开和关闭。在灌注结束时,收获不同隔室的样品,通过高效液相色谱法测量培养基的浓度。结果与闭孔技术相比,使用开口(93.17 Vs52.50≤μg/ ml,p≤0.001)和(76.26 vs 51.65)和(76.26 Vs 51.65)和(76.26 Vs 51.65)和(76.26 Vs 51.65)和(76.26 vs 51.65.μg/ ml,p? &?0.001)。两种技术腹膜组织浓度的两种技术之间没有差异(18.07 Vs 19.17?μg/ g,p?= 0.51)。结论使用任一项技术,不修饰肺部腹膜吸收。然而,使用开放技术的Pemetrexed的系统浓度增加,表明它可以提高全身毒性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Surgical Oncology》 |2018年第6期|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Maisonneuve‐Rosemont Research Center Maisonneuve‐Rosemont HospitalUniversity of MontrealMontreal;

    Maisonneuve‐Rosemont Research Center Maisonneuve‐Rosemont HospitalUniversity of MontrealMontreal;

    Maisonneuve‐Rosemont Research Center Maisonneuve‐Rosemont HospitalUniversity of MontrealMontreal;

    Maisonneuve‐Rosemont Research Center Maisonneuve‐Rosemont HospitalUniversity of MontrealMontreal;

    Maisonneuve‐Rosemont Research Center Maisonneuve‐Rosemont HospitalUniversity of MontrealMontreal;

    Maisonneuve‐Rosemont Research Center Maisonneuve‐Rosemont HospitalUniversity of MontrealMontreal;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 肿瘤学;
  • 关键词

    experimental study; HIPEC; pemetrexed;

    机译:实验研究;Hipec;Pemetrexed;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号