首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences >Gait Speed vs; VES-13: A Pilot Study Comparing Screening Tools to Determine the Need for a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Senior Women with Breast Cancer
【24h】

Gait Speed vs; VES-13: A Pilot Study Comparing Screening Tools to Determine the Need for a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Senior Women with Breast Cancer

机译:步态速度vs; VES-13:一项试验研究比较筛查工具,以确定患有乳腺癌高级女性综合性老年评估的需求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/Objectives: Patients aged 70 years and older may be suboptimally treated with cancer therapy because of the lack of clinical trial data in this population. The Gomprehensive Geriatric Assessment can be time consuming, and access to geriatricians is limited. This study aims to determine whether gait speed (GS) analysis is equivalent to the widely accepted Vulnerable Elders Survey 13 (VES-13) in identifying vulnerable or frail patients in need of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. Methods: A pilot prospective cohort study was carried out at a tertiary cancer centre in Toronto, Canada, in a radiation-oncology breast follow-up clinic. GS analysis and VES-13 were completed by each patient at the same clinic visit. GS of < 1 meter/second (m/s) and VES-13 score >=3 were considered abnormal. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and Kappa characteristic were calculated for GS compared with VES-13. Results and Discussion: Twenty-nine participants aged 70 years and older with any stage of breast cancer Were included. The GS was 67% sensitive and 95% specific for abnormal VES-13 scores. The GS had an 86% positive predictive value and 86% negative predictive value for abnormal scores on VES-13. Overall, the GS showed a substantial strength of agreement with the VES-13 (kappa 0.66, P < .0001). Conclusion: The GS analysis compared very well with VES-13 scores, and this may be a reasonable alternative to VES-13 screening. This pilot data warrant further study in a larger group of patients.
机译:背景/目标:70岁及以上的患者可能因癌症治疗而依赖于癌症治疗,因为缺乏该人群中的临床试验数据。 Gompreveric GeriTric评估可能是耗时的,并且获得Geriantricians的限制。本研究旨在确定步态速度(GS)分析是否相当于广泛接受的弱势长者调查13(VES-13)在识别有需要综合的老年评估的易受伤害或脆弱患者。方法:在加拿大多伦多的第三次癌症中心进行了试验前瞻研究,在加拿大多伦多乳房后续诊所进行。 GS分析和VES-13在同一诊所访问中由每位患者完成。 <1米/秒(M / s)和VES-13得分> = 3的GS被认为是异常的。与VES-13相比,对GS计算了敏感性,特异性,正负预测值和Kappa特征。结果与讨论:70岁及以上患有乳腺癌任何阶段的二十九岁的参与者。 GS为67%敏感,95%特异于异常VES-13分数。 GS在VES-13上的异常分数具有86%的阳性预测值和86%的负预测值。总体而言,GS与VES-13(KAPPA 0.66,P <.0001)显示了一致的达成重大契约。结论:GS分析与VES-13分数相比,这可能是VES-13筛选的合理替代品。该试点数据在更大的患者中进行进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号