首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics >The Accuracy on the Common Pan-Tompkins Based QRS Detection Methods Through Low-Quality Electrocardiogram Database
【24h】

The Accuracy on the Common Pan-Tompkins Based QRS Detection Methods Through Low-Quality Electrocardiogram Database

机译:通过低质量的心电图数据库基于普通PAN-TOMPKINS的QRS检测方法的准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

QRS complex detection has been extensively studied over the past decades. Pan-Tompkins based methods were the most widely used QRS complex detectors. These methods could obtain high accuracy on high-quality clinical ECG data. However, the accuracy of the Pan-Tompkins based QRS detection methods on a low-quality ECG database should be clarified. In this paper, three Pan-Tompkins based QRS complex detectors were tested on both high and low-quality ECG databases, i.e., the original Pan-Tompkins method and the following improved versions of Pan-Tompkins based method with mean and median peak level estimation respectively. Two hundred 10-minute ECG recordings from the 2014 PhysioNet/CinC Challenge were used (100 from the high-quality database and 100 from the low-quality database). Accuracy was used as the performance criterion for the methods. All three Pan-Tompkins based QRS detection algorithms had high detection accuracies on the high-quality ECG database (> 99%), whereas relatively low detection accuracies were reported for the lowquality ECG database (76.03% was the highest result for the Pan-Tompkins based method with median peak level estimation and 74.49% was the lowest result for the original Pan-Tompkins method). We found that it is better to use the median peak level estimation to avoid the sudden amplitude change effects. In addition, the original Pan-Tompkins method had the highest computational efficiency. In this study, the performance of three common Pan-Tompkins based QRS complex detection algorithms were systematically analyzed and their noise responses were also tested. The conclusion generated by this study could potentially offer important reference for the reasonable use of those methods.
机译:QRS复杂检测在过去几十年中已广泛研究过。基于Pan-Tompkins的方法是最广泛使用的QRS复杂探测器。这些方法可以在高质量的临床ECG数据上获得高精度。然而,应澄清基于低质量的ECG数据库上的PAN-TOMPKINS的QRS检测方法的准确性。在本文中,在高质量和低质量的ECG数据库中测试了三个基于PAN-TOMPKINS的QRS复杂探测器,即原始PAN-TOMPKINS方法和以下基于PAN-TOMPKINS的方法,具有平均值和中值峰级估计分别。使用2014年的物理仪/ CINC挑战的两百10分钟的ECG录制(100来自高质量数据库,100来自低质量数据库)。准确性用作方法的性能标准。基于三个基于PAN-TOMPKINS的QRS检测算法在高质量的ECG数据库(> 99%)上具有高的检测精度,而低低位的ECG数据库报告了相对较低的检测准确性(76.03%是PAN-TOMPKINS的最高结果基于MEDIAN峰级估计的方法和74.49%是原始PAN-TOMPKINS方法的最低结果)。我们发现最好使用中值峰值级别估计来避免突然的幅度变化效果。此外,原始PAN-TOMPKINS方法具有最高的计算效率。在这项研究中,系统地分析了三种普通的Pan-Tompkins的QRS复杂检测算法的性能,并且还测试了它们的噪声反应。本研究产生的结论可能是合理使用这些方法的重要参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号