...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes, obesity & metabolism >Closed-loop driven by control-to-range algorithm outperforms threshold-low-glucose-suspend insulin delivery on glucose control albeit not on nocturnal hypoglycaemia in prepubertal patients with type 1 diabetes in a supervised hotel setting
【24h】

Closed-loop driven by control-to-range algorithm outperforms threshold-low-glucose-suspend insulin delivery on glucose control albeit not on nocturnal hypoglycaemia in prepubertal patients with type 1 diabetes in a supervised hotel setting

机译:通过控制到范围算法驱动的闭环优于葡萄糖控制的阈值 - 低葡萄糖 - 悬浮胰岛素递送,尽管在受监督的酒店环境中的1型糖尿病患者中的预科患者夜间低血糖症

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This randomized control trial investigated glucose control with closed-loop (CL) versus threshold-low-glucose-suspend (TLGS) insulin pump delivery in pre-pubertal children with type 1 diabetes in supervised hotel conditions. The patients [n = 24, age range: 7-12, HbA1c: 7.5 +/- 0.5% (58 +/- 5 mmol/mol)] and their parents were admitted twice at a 3-week interval. CL control to range or TLGS set at 3.9 mmoL/L were assessed for 48 hour in randomized order. Admissions included three meals and one snack, and physical exercise. Meal boluses followed individual insulin/carb ratios. While overnight (22:00-08:00) per cent continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) time below 3.9 mmol/L (primary outcome) was similar, time in ranges 3.9 to 10.0 and 3.9 to 7.8 mmoL/L and mean CGM were all significantly improved with CL (P 0.001). These results were confirmed over the whole 48 hour. Disconnections between devices and limited accuracy of glucose sensors in the hypoglycaemic range appeared as limiting factors for optimal control. CL mode was well accepted while fear of hypoglycaemia was unchanged. CL did not minimize nocturnal hypoglycaemia exposure but improved time in target range compared to TLGS. Although safe and well-accepted, CL systems would benefit from more integrated devices.
机译:该随机控制试验研究了用闭环(CL)的葡萄糖对照与阈值 - 低葡萄糖 - 悬浮(TLG)胰岛素泵输送在普通的糖尿病患者中,在监督的酒店条件下的1型糖尿病。患者[n = 24,年龄范围:7-12,HBA1C:7.5 +/- 0.5%(58 +/- 5mmol / mol)]及其父母以3周的间隔录取两次。在随机顺序中评估CL控制到3.9mmol / L的范围或TLG。入学包括三餐和一个小吃和体育锻炼。膳食推注遵循单个胰岛素/碳粉比例。虽然过夜(22:00-08:00)百分比的连续葡萄糖监测(CGM)时间低于3.9mmol / L(主要结果)相似,范围为3.9至10.0和3.9至7.8 mmol / l,并​​且平均cgm都是用Cl(P <0.001)显着改善。这些结果在整个48小时内得到了确认。在低血糖范围内的装置之间的断开和有限精度的葡萄糖传感器出现为最佳控制的限制因素。 CL模式得到很好的接受,而对低血糖的恐惧不变。 CL未尽量减少夜间低血糖暴露,但与TLGS相比,目标范围内的时间改善。虽然安全良好,但CL系统将受益于更多集成设备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号