...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes, obesity & metabolism >Effects of exenatide once weekly plus dapagliflozin, exenatide once weekly alone, or dapagliflozin alone added to metformin monotherapy in subgroups of patients with type 2 diabetes in the DURATION DURATION ‐8 randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Effects of exenatide once weekly plus dapagliflozin, exenatide once weekly alone, or dapagliflozin alone added to metformin monotherapy in subgroups of patients with type 2 diabetes in the DURATION DURATION ‐8 randomized controlled trial

机译:艾塞司醛每周的影响加上Dapagliflozin,单独每周一次,单独加入Dapagliflozin,在持续时间的2型糖尿病患者的亚组中添加到二甲双胍单疗法-8随机对照试验中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This analysis assessed whether responses with exenatide once weekly plus dapagliflozin ( n ?=?231), exenatide once weekly alone ( n ?=?230), or dapagliflozin alone ( n ?=?233) differed in key patient subpopulations of the DURATION‐8 trial. Potential treatment‐by‐subgroup interactions for changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight after 28?weeks were evaluated among subgroups determined by baseline HbA1c, age, sex, body mass index, type 2 diabetes duration, race, ethnicity and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Exenatide once weekly plus dapagliflozin reduced HbA1c and body weight across all subgroups: least‐squares mean reductions ranged from ?8.4 to ?26.1?mmol/mol (?0.77% to ?2.39%) for HbA1c and from ?2.07 to ?4.55?kg for body weight. Potential treatment‐by‐subgroup interactions ( P ??.10) were found for HbA1c change by age ( P?= .016) and eGFR ( P?= .097). Age subgroup analysis findings were not consistent with expected mechanistic effects, with the small number of patients aged ≥65?years ( n ?=?74 vs n ?=?499 for patients aged 65?years) limiting the interpretability of the interaction term. In the exenatide once weekly plus dapagliflozin and dapagliflozin groups, but not the exenatide once weekly group, HbA1c reductions were greater among patients with eGFR ≥90 vs ≥60 to 90?mL/min/1.73?m 2 (least‐squares mean reductions of ?23.6 vs ?19.0?mmol/mol [?2.16% vs ?1.74%], ?17.3 vs ?12.0?mmol/mol [?1.58% vs ?1.10%], and ?17.7 vs ?16.9?mmol/mol [?1.62% vs ?1.55%] for the respective treatments); this was consistent with the mechanism of action of dapagliflozin. A potential treatment‐by‐subgroup interaction was observed for change in body weight by sex ( P?= .099), with greater weight loss for women vs men across all treatments (range??2.56 to ?3.98?kg vs ?0.56 to ?2.99?kg). In conclusion, treatment with exenatide once weekly plus dapagliflozin reduced HbA1c and body weight across all patient subgroups and was more effective than exenatide once weekly or dapagliflozin alone in all adequately sized subgroups.
机译:该分析评估是否对eNEnatide每周回应加上dapagliflozin(n?=Δ231),单独每周一次(n?=Δ230),或单独的dapagliflozin(n?=Δ233)不同于持续时间的关键患者群区分析 - 8试验。在由基线HBA1C,年龄,性别,体重指数,2型糖尿病持续时间,种族,种族和估计肾小球确定的亚组中,在28〜28℃下进行血糖血红蛋白(HBA1c)和体重的变化的潜在治疗血红蛋白(HBA1c)和体重的相互作用。过滤率(EGFR)。 exenatide每周一次加达dapagliflozin在所有亚组中减少HBA1C和体重:至少正方形的平均值从?8.4到26.1?26.1?mmol / mol(?0.77%至β.2.39%)用于HBA1C,从?2.07到?4.55?kg体重。逐群相互作用(p≤1C)对逐群相互作用(p?=。10)(p?= .016)和egfr(p?= .097)。年龄亚组分析结果与预期的机制效力不一致,少数≥65岁的患者?年龄(n?=?74 vs n?= 499,患者为年龄≥65Ω岁)限制互动的可解释性学期。在exenatide每周加达达格拉洛唑和达葡萄球菌组,但不是艾塞司醛,每周一次,EGFR≥90vs≥60至90〜90?ml / min / 1.73?m 2(最小二乘患者(最小二乘意味着减少?23.6 vs?19.0?mmol / mol [?2.16%vs?1.74%],?17.3 vs?12.0?mmol / mol [?1.58%vs?1.10%],和?17.7 vs?16.9?mmol / mol [?<5.62%vs?1.55%]各自治疗);这与Dapagliflozin的作用机制一致。观察到逐次组合的亚组相互作用因性别而变化(p?= .099),妇女对所有治疗中的男性更大的减肥(范围?? 2.56到?3.98?kg vs?0.56至?2.99?kg)。总之,每周用艾塞纳西亚肽处理加达塔基希辛,在所有患者亚组中降低了HBA1C和体重,并且在所有适当大小的亚组中单独单独使用一次Exenatide或Dapagliflozin。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号