...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes, obesity & metabolism >Study design choices for evaluating the comparative safety of diabetes medications: An evaluation of pioglitazone use and risk of bladder cancer in older US adults with type‐2 diabetes
【24h】

Study design choices for evaluating the comparative safety of diabetes medications: An evaluation of pioglitazone use and risk of bladder cancer in older US adults with type‐2 diabetes

机译:研究糖尿病药物比较安全性的设计选择:患有2型糖尿病患者血红素吲哚酮利用及膀胱癌风险的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Aim The aim of the study was to empirically demonstrate the effect of varying study designs when evaluating the safety of pioglitazone in treating bladder cancer. Methods We identified Medicare beneficiaries above 65?years of age with diabetes between 2008 and 2015 and with classified exposure (at least two claims within 180?days) to glucose‐lowering drugs (GLD), pioglitazone or another drug. The effects of varying the following study design parameters on bladder cancer risk were assessed: use of a new vs existing drug, choice of referent (all non‐users and users of GLDs, non‐insulin GLDs and DPP‐4s) and whether or not censoring accounted for treatment change. We used the Cox proportional hazards model to obtain adjusted HRs and 95% CIs. Results We included 1,510,212 patients classified as pioglitazone users (N = 135,188) or non‐users (N = 1,375,024). Users had more diabetic complications than non‐users, but fewer than insulin users. The HR ranged from 1.10 (1.01‐1.20) to 1.13 (0.99‐1.29) when censoring ignored treatment change, suggesting a weak association or none between pioglitazone and bladder cancer, probably under‐estimating risk. However, the HR was 1.20 (1.01‐1.42) when cohorts were restricted to new users, censored upon treatment change, and when DPP‐4 was used as the referent, suggesting an increased risk of bladder cancer associated with pioglitazone. Conclusions The continued demand for new GLDs indicates the need for more robust observational methods to improve the value of generating real‐world evidence in equipping clinicians to make informed prescribing decisions. Although there is no one‐size‐fits‐all approach, we recommend active comparator new user study designs that compare therapeutically equivalent drugs and account for treatment changes during follow‐up to present the least biased comparative safety estimates.
机译:摘要目的该研究的目的是经验证明在评估吡格列酮治疗膀胱癌时的安全性时变化的研究设计的效果。方法我们将Medicare受益人确定在65岁以下,2008年至2015年之间糖尿病,并在葡萄糖降低药物(GLD),吡格列酮或其他药物中的分类暴露(在180例中至少有两项要求)。评估了改变以下研究设计参数对膀胱癌风险的影响:使用新的VS现有药物,选择指数(所有非用户和GLD的用户,非胰岛素GLD和DPP-4S)以及是否或不是审查占治疗变革。我们使用Cox比例危险模型来获得调整后的HRS和95%CIS。结果我们将1,510,212名患者分为吡格列酮用户(n = 135,188)或非用户(n = 1,375,024)。用户比非用户有更多的糖尿病并发症,但少于胰岛素用户。当忽略治疗变化时,人力资源从1.10(1.01-1.20)到1.13(0.99-1.29),表明疾病和膀胱癌和膀胱癌之间的薄弱关联或无,可能是估计风险。然而,当群组限制为新用户时,人力资源为1.20(1.01-1.42),在治疗变化时审查,当DPP-4用作参考文献时,表明与吡格列酮相关的膀胱癌的风险增加。结论对新GLD的持续需求表明需要更加强大的观测方法,以提高在装备临床医生中提出知情规定决策的现实世界证据的价值。虽然没有一种尺寸适合所有方法,我们建议活动比较器新的用户学习设计,该设计比较治疗性等同的药物,并在后续行动期间进行治疗变化的账户,以呈现最不偏向的比较安全估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号