首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes, obesity & metabolism >Superior HbA1c control with the fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with a maximum dose of 50?units of insulin degludec in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, double‐blind, randomized trial
【24h】

Superior HbA1c control with the fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with a maximum dose of 50?units of insulin degludec in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, double‐blind, randomized trial

机译:优质的HBA1C控制与胰岛素Degludec和Liraglutide(IDEGLIRA)的固定比例组合,与最大剂量为50岁?在第3期患有2型糖尿病的日本人中胰岛素Degludec的单位,双盲,随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract Aims To investigate the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with 50?U insulin degludec (degludec) or less in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Materials and methods In this 26‐week, double‐blind, multicentre, treat‐to‐target trial, Japanese individuals with T2D that was uncontrolled with basal or pre‐mix insulin (20–50?units) were randomized (1:1) to receive IDegLira or degludec, both with metformin. The maximum dose was 50 dose steps (IDegLira) or 50?units (degludec). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c with IDegLira vs degludec after 26?weeks of treatment. Results In total, 210 Japanese individuals were randomized to IDegLira or degludec and completion rates were 100% and 93%, respectively. IDegLira was superior to degludec with respect to change from baseline in HbA1c: estimated treatment difference (ETD) (95% confidence interval), ?13.98?mmol/Mol (?16.41; ?11.55); P ?0.0001. The change in mean HbA1c was from 70.6 by ?21.3?mmol/Mol with IDegLira and from 70.1 by ?7.1?mmol/Mol with degludec. Mean change in body weight was ?0.7 kg with IDegLira and 0.7 kg with degludec: ETD (95% CI) ?1.41?kg (?2.26; ?0.56); P =?0.0012. Mean daily total insulin dose was significantly lower with IDegLira (37.6 U) as compared to that with degludec (41.2 U) at Week 26. Overall rates of severe or blood glucose‐confirmed hypoglycaemia and adverse events were comparable between treatment groups. Conclusions IDegLira provided superior reductions in HbA1c compared with ≤50?U degludec, with weight loss and similar hypoglycaemia rates and no unexpected safety or tolerability issues. These results suggest that this treatment could be an attractive intensification option for Japanese subjects with T2D that was uncontrolled with basal or pre‐mixed insulin.
机译:摘要旨在探讨胰岛素Degledec / Liraglutide(IDEGLIRA)的疗效和安全性与50型糖尿病(T2D)的日本个体胰岛素Degludec(Degludec)或更低。在本26周,双盲,多期,治疗目标试验中的材料和方法,随机抑制基础或预混胰岛素(20-50个单元)的T2D的日本个体(20-50个单位)(1:1)接收Ideglira或Degludec,既与二甲双胍。最大剂量为50剂步骤(IDEGLIRA)或50Ω(Degledec)。主要终点是从HBA1C的基线改变,在26℃的治疗后的ideglira vs degludec。结果总计,210个日本个体随机转向伊葡萄酒或Degludec,分别为100%和93%。 IDEGLIRA在HBA1C的基线改变方面优于Degledec:估计治疗差异(ETD)(95%置信区间),?13.98?Mmol / Mol(?16.41;?11.55); P&?0.0001。平均HBA1C的变化由70.6×21.3?mmol / mol,与Idegliraa和70.1×7.1摩尔/摩尔与Degleudec。体重的平均变化是Δ0.7公斤,艾德格拉和0.7千克与Degledec:ETD(95%CI)?1.41?kg(?2.26;?0.56); p = 0.0012。与第26周的Degledec(41.2 u)相比,Ideglira(37.6u)的平均每日总胰岛素剂量显着降低。治疗组之间的严重或血糖证实的总体血糖和不良事件的总体速率相比。结论IDEGLIRA在HBA1C中提供了卓越的降低与≤50?U​​ degledec相比,减肥和类似的低血糖率,没有意外的安全性或耐受性问题。这些结果表明,这种治疗可能是日本受试者的有吸引力的强化选择,其T2D具有基础或预混合胰岛素的不受控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号