首页> 外文期刊>Journal of women’s health >Physician Nonprofessional Cancer Experience and Ovarian Cancer Screening Practices: Results from a National Survey of Primary Care Physicians
【24h】

Physician Nonprofessional Cancer Experience and Ovarian Cancer Screening Practices: Results from a National Survey of Primary Care Physicians

机译:医生非专业癌症经验和卵巢癌筛查实践:国家初级保健医生的国家调查结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Routine ovarian cancer screening is ineffective; therefore, no professional organization recommends this screening in asymptomatic patients. However, many physicians have recommended screening, exposing patients to unnecessary risk. Little research exists on how nonprofessional experience with cancer influences physicians' screening practices. This study examines the association between physicians' nonprofessional experience with cancer and reported adherence to ovarian cancer screening guidelines. Materials and Methods: A mail questionnaire with an annual examination vignette and questions about cancer screening recommendations was sent to a random sample of 3,200 U.S. family physicians, general internists, and obstetrician-gynecologists. This analysis included 497 physicians who received a vignette of a woman at average ovarian cancer risk and weighted results to represent these physician groups nationally. The outcome measure was adherence to ovarian cancer screening guidelines. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression estimated adjusted risk ratios for guideline adherence. Results: In unadjusted analyses, 86.0% of physicians without nonprofessional cancer experience reported adherence to ovarian cancer screening guidelines compared with 69.2% of physicians with their own history of cancer, or a family member or close friend/coworker with cancer (p=0.0045). In adjusted analyses, physicians with cancer themselves or in a family member or close friend/coworker were 0.82 times less likely (CI: 0.73-0.92) to report adhering to ovarian cancer screening recommendations than those without nonprofessional cancer experience. Conclusions: Despite recommendations to the contrary, many physicians reported recommending ovarian cancer screening in low-risk women. Physicians with nonprofessional cancer experience were more likely to report offering or ordering nonrecommended screening than physicians without this experience.
机译:目的:常规卵巢癌筛查无效;因此,没有专业组织建议在无症状患者中进行这种筛查。然而,许多医生推荐筛查,将患者暴露于不必要的风险。对癌症的非专业经验如何影响医生的筛查实践,存在很少的研究。本研究探讨了医生与癌症的非专业经验之间的关联,并报告依赖于卵巢癌筛查指南。材料和方法:邮件调查问卷,每年考试的小插图和关于癌症筛查建议的问题被送到3,200名美国家庭医生,一般内科医生和产科医生 - 妇科医生的随机样本。该分析包括497名医生,他们在平均卵巢癌症风险和加权结果的平均接受了一个女人的小插图,以代表这些医生团体。结果措施依赖于卵巢癌筛查指南。逐步多变量逻辑回归估算调整的风险比为指南遵守。结果:在未经调整的分析中,86.0%的没有非专业癌症经验的医生报告依从卵巢癌筛查指南,而69.2%的医生患有自己的癌症史,或家庭成员或与癌症的亲密朋友/同事(p = 0.0045) 。在调整后的分析中,患有癌症或家庭成员或亲密朋友/同事的医生可能性(CI:0.73-0.92)的0.82倍,以报告涉及卵巢癌筛查的建议,而不是没有非专业癌症经验。结论:尽管建议相反,许多医生报告了在低危妇女中推荐卵巢癌筛查。没有这种经验的医生更有可能报告非专业癌症经验的医生比医生报告或订购非推荐筛查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号