...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of thoracic imaging >Cross-modality Accuracy of Dual-step, Prospectively Electrocardiography-triggered Dual-source Computed Tomorgaphy Compared With Same-day Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Follow-up of Heart-transplant Patients
【24h】

Cross-modality Accuracy of Dual-step, Prospectively Electrocardiography-triggered Dual-source Computed Tomorgaphy Compared With Same-day Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Follow-up of Heart-transplant Patients

机译:双步,前瞻性心电图触发的双源计算的横向模态精度与当天超声心动图和心脏磁共振成像在心脏移植患者随访中进行了相比

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose:An accurate evaluation of left ventricular volumes, mass, and ejection fraction (EF) and an early exclusion or detection of significant coronary artery disease or cardiac allograft vasculopathy are mandatory for clinical management and prognosis assessment of heart-transplanted patients (HTP). The purpose of this article was to evaluate the role of dual-step prospective electrocardiography-triggered Dual-Source CT (pECG(dual-step)-DSCT) in HTP for the assessment of left-ventricular function, in comparison with echocardiography (echo) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) performed on the same day, and of the coronary arteries as well.Materials and Methods:Left-ventricular EF, end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, stroke volume, cardiac output (CO), and mass were assessed in 11 HTP by pECG(dual-step)-DSCT in comparison with CMR and echo performed on the same day. During all the examinations, the heart rate was recorded. CT coronary artery assessment was also performed.Results:Heart rate was lower during DSCT (75.67.8bpm; P0.001). EF resulted slightly lower for DSCT (55.7%+/- 5.0%; P0.05) in comparison with CMR (57.8%+/- 5.3%; P0.05) and echo (59.2%+/- 5.6%; P0.05). DSCT showed statistically significant higher end-diastolic volume (153.7 +/- 24.2mL), end-systolic volume (67.8 +/- 11.5mL), and stroke volume (85.9 +/- 17.6mL) (P0.01 up to 0.001) than CMR, but with a high correlation (P0.001). Cardiac output was almost similar for DSCT versus CMR, with a very high correlation coefficient (r=0.914; P0.001). DSCT showed higher mass values than CMR (P0.001), but with a high correlation (r=0.866; P0.001). DSCT versus echo results were less correlated. No significant coronary artery disease was detected.Conclusion:pECG(dual-step)-DSCT allows reliable assessment of left-ventricular function in HTP, with good agreement and correlation with CMR, within a global diagnostic approach including coronary artery evaluation in one single-volume acquisition.
机译:目的:对左心室体积,质量和射血分数(EF)的准确评估以及显着的冠状动脉疾病或心脏异种移植血管病变的早期排除或检测是对心脏移植患者(HTP)的临床管理和预后评估的强制性。本文的目的是评估双步前瞻性心电图 - 触发的双源CT(PECG(双步)-DSCT)在HTP中的作用,与超声心动图(回声)相比,左心室功能的评估和心脏磁共振(CMR)在同一天进行,冠心动脉也是如此。材料和方法:左心室EF,舒张末期体积,末端收缩量,中风体积,心输出(CO),和与CMR和同一天进行的CMR和回声相比,通过PECG(双步)-DSCT在11 HTP中评估肿块。在所有检查中,记录了心率。还进行了CT冠状动脉评估。结果:DSCT期间的心率低(75.67.8bpm; p <0.001)。与CMR相比,EF导致DSCT(55.7%+ / - 5.0%; P0.05)导致略低(55.7%+ / - 5.0%; P0.05)和回声(59.2%+ / - 5.6%; P0.05 )。 DSCT显示出统计学上显着的更高的最终舒张体积(153.7 +/- 24×24ml),末端收缩量(67.8 +/- 11.5ml)和卒中体积(85.9 +/- 17.6ml)(P <0.01高达0.001)比CMR,但具有高的相关性(P <0.001)。心输出对于DSCT与CMR几乎相似,具有非常高的相关系数(R = 0.914; P <0.001)。 DSCT显示比CMR(P <0.001)更高的质量值,但具有高的相关性(r = 0.866; p <0.001)。 DSCT与回声结果不太相关。未检测到明显的冠状动脉疾病。结论:PECG(双步)-DSCT可以在全球诊断方法中致良好的协议和与CMR相关的左心室功能进行可靠评估,包括冠状动脉评估在一个单一 - 批量采集。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号