首页> 外文期刊>Journal of thoracic imaging >Differentiating Usual Interstitial Pneumonia From Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia Using High-resolution Computed Tomography: The 'Straight-edge Sign'
【24h】

Differentiating Usual Interstitial Pneumonia From Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia Using High-resolution Computed Tomography: The 'Straight-edge Sign'

机译:使用高分辨率计算断层扫描的非特异性间质性肺炎的常用肺炎:“直边标志”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose:The purpose of this article was to determine whether a novel finding on coronal computed tomography (CT) can help differentiate usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) from nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) in order to obviate lung biopsy.Materials and Methods:Two chest radiologists, blinded to clinical data, reviewed 3 preselected coronal images from CT scans, performed within 1 year of surgical lung biopsy (SLB), from 51 patients with biopsy-proven UIP and 15 with biopsy-proven NSIP. The 198 (66x3) images were anonymized and randomized. The radiologists assessed each coronal image for the presence or absence of the straight-edge sign (SES) on both the right and left sides, anecdotally thought to be more common in NSIP than in UIP. The SES was defined as reticulation isolated to the lung bases with sharp demarcation in the craniocaudal plane and without substantial extension along the lateral margins of the lungs. A validation cohort from a second medical center was also evaluated to reassess our findings.Results:The absence of a bilateral SES yielded a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value of 56.9%, 93.3%, 96.7%, and 38.9%, respectively, for UIP on SLB. The unilateral or bilateral absence of the SES yielded a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and negative predictive value of 76.5%, 66.7%, 88.6%, and 45.5%, respectively, for UIP on SLB. For the 11 subjects with an overall CT pattern consistent with NSIP but a pathologic diagnosis of UIP, the SES was absent in 6 (54.5%) subjects. In the validation cohort, the SES was much more common in NSIP than in UIP (46.6% compared with 3.3%, respectively; P0.001).Conclusion:The absence of the SES has a high PPV for biopsy-proven UIP. Bilateral absence of the SES has high specificity (93.3%) for biopsy-proven UIP. The SES may be useful for differentiating UIP from NSIP.
机译:目的:本文的目的是确定对冠状计算断层摄影(CT)的新型发现是否可以帮助来自非特异性间质性肺炎(NSIP)的常规间质肺炎(UIP)以消除肺活检。材料和方法:两个胸部向临床数据蒙蔽的放射科医师从CT扫描中审查了3个预选的冠状图像,在手术肺活检(SLB)的1年内,从51例活组织检查证明的UIP和活检证明的NSIP患者中进行。 198(66x3)图像匿名和随机化。放射科医生评估了每个冠状图像,用于在右侧和左侧的直边符号(SES)的存在或不存在,在NSIP中缺点地认为比UIP更常见。 SES被定义为具有尖锐划分的肺部碱基的网状物,并且沿着肺部的横向边缘而没有显着延伸。还评估了第二个医疗中心的验证队列以重新评估我们的发现。结果:不存在双侧​​SES,产生敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV),负预测值为56.9%,93.3%,96.7%分别为38.9%,用于SLB上的UIP。单方面或双侧没有SES分别产生敏感性,特异性,PPV,分别为SLB上的UIP分别为76.5%,66.7%,88.6%和45.5%。对于具有整体CT模式的11个受试者与NSIP一致,但对UIP的病理诊断,SES在6(54.5%)受试者中不存在。在验证队列中,SES在NSIP中比UIP更常见(46.6%,分别与3.3%相比; P <0.001)。结论:没有SES的活组织检查验证UIP具有高PPV。双侧没有SES具有高特异性(93.3%)用于活组织检查证明的UIP。 SES可能有用于将UIP与NSIP分离。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号