【24h】

HIV Testing at Home?

机译:艾滋病毒在家测试?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

HIV testing rates were threefold higher in high-risk emergency department patients given take-home tests than in controls. Many patients at highest risk for contracting HIV do not have regular medical care and may be unable to access outpatient HIV testing sites. The emergency department (ED) has, in much of the U.S., become an important site for HIV screening (NEJM JW Emerg Med Mar . 2018 and Ann Emerg Med 2018; 72:29). However, EDs are crowded, and visits may present problems (e.g., privacy, cost, transportation) for patients needing testing. Enter at-home HIV testing. In this single-ED study, 100 high-risk patients who tested negative for HIV were randomized to receive either a take-home test kit or a brochure on the importance of regular repeated HIV testing (control group). The home-test group also received instructions on test interpretation and next steps if the test was either indeterminate or reactive. Notably, the baseline seroprevalence of HIV in this ED is relatively high, at 6%. At 3 months, 34 participants in the home-test group and 37 controls completed a follow-up phone survey. Of these, 65% in the home-test group reported having had been tested, all with the home kit, compared with 19% of controls (adjusted relative risk, 3.95). No patients reported positive tests.
机译:高风险急诊部门患者的HIV测试率高于给予家庭试验比对照。许多患者收缩艾滋病毒的最高风险患者没有经常医疗,可能无法访问门诊艾滋病毒检测站点。在大部分美国的急诊部门(ED)成为艾滋病毒筛查的重要网站(Nejm JW Excerm Mar。2018年和Ann Ember Med 2018; 72:29)。然而,EDS是拥挤的,并且访问可能对需要测试的患者存在问题(例如,隐私,成本,运输)。进入家庭艾滋病毒检测。在这种单一ED研究中,100名测试HIV的高风险患者被随机检测,以接受用于定期重复艾滋病毒检测(对照组)的重要性的试管套件或小册子。如果测试要么不确定或反应,则主机组还接收有关测试解释和后续步骤的说明。值得注意的是,艾滋病毒的基线SEROPREVALING均相对较高,6%为6%。在3个月内,在家庭测试组和37个控件中的34名参与者完成了后续电话调查。其中,在主试论中,65%的人报告已被测试,所有与家用套件相比,19%的控制(调整相对风险,3.95)。没有患者报告过阳性测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号