首页> 外文期刊>Journal Of The South African Institute Of Mining & Metallurgy >The new SANS 10320:2016 versus the 2014 Australian guidelines for the estimation and classification of coal resources-what are the implications for southern African coal resource estimators?
【24h】

The new SANS 10320:2016 versus the 2014 Australian guidelines for the estimation and classification of coal resources-what are the implications for southern African coal resource estimators?

机译:新的SANS 10320:2016年与煤炭资源估计和分类的2014年澳大利亚澳大利亚的准则 - 南部非洲煤炭资源估算员有什么影响?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The past three decades have witnessed the publishing of reporting codes for all the main stock exchanges, as well as the evolution of a uniform international standard covering the definition, estimation, and public reporting of Mineral Resources. Many of these reporting codes have commodity-specific reporting sections for coal, but only two countries (Australia and South Africa) have specific guidelines for reporting on coal resources. Both of these companion documents (SANS 10320:2016 and the Australian Guidelines for the Estimation and Classification of Coal Resources, 2014) have recently been updated. Unlike their parent codes, which have become increasingly similar, these new guidelines have diverged and are different in a number of significant ways, which in turn will have an impact on coal resource estimators working in the coalfields of south-central Africa, particularly in countries where no commodity-specific guidelines for coal exist.
机译:过去三十年目睹了所有主要证券交易所的报告代码发布,以及涵盖矿产资源定义,估计和公开报告的统一国际标准的演变。 这些报告代码中的许多煤炭具有特定于商品的报告部分,但只有两国(澳大利亚和南非)有具体的报告煤炭资源准则。 最近最近更新了这些伴随文件(SANS 10320:2016以及煤炭资源估计和分类的澳大利亚估计和分类指南)。 与父母代码不同,这一级别越来越相似,这些新的指导方针分歧并以多种显着的方式不同,这反过来又将对煤炭地区煤炭资源估算者产生影响,特别是在南非煤田,特别是在各国的煤炭资源估算 没有任何商品的煤炭指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号