...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Access to Primary, Mental Health, and Specialty Care: a Comparison of Medicaid and Commercially Insured Populations in Oregon
【24h】

Access to Primary, Mental Health, and Specialty Care: a Comparison of Medicaid and Commercially Insured Populations in Oregon

机译:获得小学,心理健康和专业护理:俄勒冈州医疗补助和商业上投保人群的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To describe how access to primary and specialty care differs for Medicaid patients relative to commercially insured patients, and how these differences vary across rural and urban counties, using comprehensive claims data from Oregon. Design Cross-sectional study of risk-adjusted access rates for two types of primary care providers (physicians; nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs)); four types of mental health providers (psychiatrists, psychologists, advanced practice NPs or PAs specializing in mental health care, behavioral specialists); and four physician specialties (obstetrics and gynecology, general surgery, gastroenterology, dermatology). Participants 420,947 Medicaid and 638,980 commercially insured adults in Oregon, October 2014-September 2015. Outcome Presence of any visit with each provider type, risk-adjusted for sex, age, and health conditions. Results Relative to commercially insured individuals, Medicaid enrollees had lower rates of access to primary care physicians (- 11.82%; CI - 12.01 to - 11.63%) and to some specialists (e.g., obstetrics and gynecology, dermatology), but had equivalent or higher rates of access to NPs and PAs providing primary care (4.33%; CI 4.15 to 4.52%) and a variety of mental health providers (including psychiatrists, NPs and PAs, and other behavioral specialists). Across all providers, the largest gaps in Medicaid-commercial access rates were observed in rural counties. The Medicaid-commercial patient mix was evenly distributed across primary care physicians, suggesting that access for Medicaid patients was not limited to a small subset of primary care providers. Conclusions This cross-sectional study found lower rates of access to primary care physicians for Medicaid enrollees, but Medicaid-commercial differences in access rates were not present across all provider types and displayed substantial variability across counties. Policies that address rural-urban differences as well as Medicaid-commercial differences-such as expansions of telemedicine or changes in the workforce mix-may have the largest impact on improving access to care across a wide range of populations.
机译:目的介绍医疗补助患者的初级和专业护理的访问权限如何,以及这些差异如何在农村和城市县之间变化,利用来自俄勒冈州的全面索赔数据。设计两种类型的初级护理提供者(医生;护士从业者(NPS)和医师助理(PAS)的风险调整的访问率的横截面研究;四种类型的心理健康提供者(精神病学家,心理学家,先进的练习NPS或PAS专门从事精神医疗保健,行为专家);和四个医师专业(妇产科,一般手术,胃肠学,皮肤科)。参与者420,947 Medicada和638,980名商业上保险成人在2015年10月 - 2015年10月。结果存在对每个提供商类型的任何访问,风险调整为性别,年龄和健康状况。结果相对于商业投保人,医疗报告登记率较低的初级保健医生获得率较低(11.82%; CI - 12.01至11.63%)以及一些专家(例如,妇产科,皮肤病学),但具有相同的或更高获得NPS和PAS的利率提供初级保健(4.33%; CI 4.15至4.52%)和各种心理健康提供者(包括精神科医生,NPS和PA和其他行为专家)。遍布所有提供商,在农村县中观察到医疗补助商家访问率的最大差距。医疗补充商业患者混合物均均匀分布于初级保健医生,这表明医疗补助患者的访问不限于初级护理提供者的一小部分。结论这种横断面研究发现,对医疗补助登记者的初级保健医生的访问率较低,但在所有提供商类型中,访问率的医疗补助商商业差异并不出现在跨县的大量变异性。解决农村城市差异以及医疗报告的政策 - 例如劳动力混合的远程医疗或变化的扩展 - 可能对改善各种人口的关注获得最大的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号