...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Individual vs. Group Delivery of Acupuncture Therapy for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in Urban Primary Care-a Randomized Trial
【24h】

Individual vs. Group Delivery of Acupuncture Therapy for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in Urban Primary Care-a Randomized Trial

机译:个人对阵针灸治疗对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的核疗法 - 一种随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Acupuncture has been shown to be effective for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal back, neck, and osteoarthritis pain. However, access to acupuncture treatment has been limited in medically underserved and low-income populations. Objective Acupuncture therapy delivered in groups could reduce cost and expand access. We compared the effectiveness of group versus individual acupuncture for pain and function among ethnically diverse, low-income primary care patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Design This was a randomized comparative effectiveness non-inferiority trial in 6 Bronx primary care community health centers. Participants with chronic (> 3 months) back, neck, or osteoarthritis pain were randomly assigned to individual or group acupuncture therapy for 12 weeks. Participants Seven hundred seventy-nine participants were randomized. Mean age was 54.8 years. 35.3% of participants identified as black and 56.9% identified as Latino. Seventy-six percent were Medicaid insured, 60% reported poor/fair health, and 37% were unable to work due to disability. Interventions Participants received weekly acupuncture treatment in either group or individual setting for 12 weeks. Main Measures Primary outcome was pain interference on the Brief Pain Inventory at 12 weeks; secondary outcomes were pain severity (BPI), physical and mental well-being (PROMIS-10), and opiate use. Outcome measures were collected at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks. Key Results 37.5% of individual arm and 30.3% in group had > 30% improvement in pain interference (d = 7.2%, 95% CI - 0.6%, 15.1%). Non-inferiority of group acupuncture was not demonstrated for the primary outcome assuming a margin of 10%. In the responder analysis of physical well-being, 63.1% of individual participants and 59.5% of group had clinically important improvement at 12 weeks (d = 3.6%, 95% CI - 4.2%, 11.4%). Conclusions Both individual and group acupuncture therapy delivered in primary care settings reduced chronic pain and improved physical function at 12 weeks; non-inferiority of group was not shown.
机译:背景技术针灸已被证明对治疗慢性肌肉骨骼背部,颈部和骨关节炎疼痛有效。然而,在医学方差和低收入人口中获得针灸治疗的进入受到限制。目标中提供的客观针灸疗法可以降低成本和扩展访问。我们比较了血液多样性,低收入初级护理患者慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的疼痛和功能对疼痛和功能的疗效的有效性。设计这是6个Bronx初级保健社区保健中心的随机比较有效性试验。慢性(> 3个月)的参与者背部,颈部或骨关节炎疼痛随机分配给个体或组针灸治疗12周。参与者七百七十九名参与者被随机化。平均年龄为54.8岁。 35.3%的参与者确定为黑色和56.9%被确定为拉丁裔。七十六百%的医疗补助保险人保险,60%报告差/公平健康,37%由于残疾而无法工作。干预参与者在任一组或个体环境中获得每周针灸治疗12周。主要措施的主要结果是对12周的短暂疼痛库存的疼痛干扰;二次结果是疼痛严重程度(BPI),身心健康(PROMIS-10)和Apiate使用。在基线,12和24周收集结果措施。结果37.5%的个体臂和30.3%的痛苦干扰改善了> 30%(D = 7.2%,95%CI - 0.6%,15.1%)。由于余量为10%,未对群体针灸的非自卑性展示。在响应者分析的情况下,63.1%的个体参与者和59.5%的组在12周的临床上具有临床重要的改进(D = 3.6%,95%CI-4.2%,11.4%)。结论初级保健环境中的个体和组针灸治疗降低了慢性疼痛和12周的物理功能改善;未显示组的非自卑感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号