首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Virological Methods >Do large carnivores use riparian zones? Ecological implications for forest management
【24h】

Do large carnivores use riparian zones? Ecological implications for forest management

机译:大肉食会使用河流区吗? 森林管理的生态影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As part of forest management guidelines, most North American jurisdictions require the preservation of forested areas adjacent to streams and rivers (i.e. riparian zones). Forested buffer strips with restrictions on timber harvest and road-building (i.e. riparian buffer zones) were originally implemented to protect aquatic functions and resources. Riparian buffer zones now also target terrestrial habitats and wildlife. Even so, forestry managers who implement guidelines seldom consider the value of riparian zones (RZs) for large carnivores, partly due to a lack of data available. In the present study, our objective was to understand the role of riparian zones and riparian buffer zones for large carnivores in managed boreal forests. We used nine years of GPS telemetry data (2007-2015) from radio collared grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in the Kakwa region of west-central Alberta, Canada to quantify both the use (i.e. the amount of time grizzly bears spend in RZs) and selection (i.e. use in relation to the available riparian habitat) of RZs. We examined the effects of season, sex, distance class (0-30 or 30-60 m from streams and rivers), and the surrounding forest (harvested versus non-harvested) on use and selection of RZs. We found grizzly bears spent 19.1% of their time within 60 meters from streams and rivers. Selection of RZs declined relative to the distance from streams and rivers (10.8% within 0-30 m and 8.4% within 30-60 m). During summer, grizzly bears selected RZs in harvested areas and avoided them in non-harvested areas. There was no difference in selection of RZs in harvested areas between males and females; however, in non-harvested areas, females avoided RZs and selected RZs less compared to males. These results, particularly the selection of RZs in harvested areas where RZs consist mostly of riparian buffer zones, suggest that riparian buffers provide valuable grizzly bear habitat in multiple-use landscapes. Forest management practices can support grizzly bear habitat conservation efforts by implementing riparian buffer zones in identified grizzly bear habitat and considering grizzly bear habitat use of RZs and riparian buffers as one component of riparian zone management.
机译:作为森林管理指南的一部分,大多数北美司法管辖区都需要保护与溪流和河流相邻的森林区域(即河岸区域)。最初实施的森林缓冲区具有对木材收获和道路建设(即河岸缓冲区)限制以保护水生函数和资源。河岸缓冲区现在也针对陆地栖息地和野生动物。即便如此,实施指南的林业管理人员很少考虑河岸区域(RZS)的大型食肉动物的价值,部分原因是由于可用数据缺乏。在本研究中,我们的目标是了解河岸区和河岸缓冲区在管理北方森林中的大型食肉动物的作用。我们使用九年的GPS遥测数据(2007-2015)从加拿大西部艾尔伯塔西部的Kakwa地区的广播领域(Ursus Arctos)中的群体遥控熊(Ursus Arctos)量化(即灰熊在RZS中花费的时间)和选择(即关于RZS的可用河岸栖息地的选择)。我们检查了季节,性别,距离等级(距离溪流和河流)的效果,周围的森林(收获与非收获)的使用和选择RZS。我们发现灰熊在距离溪流和河流60米之内花了19.1%的时间。 RZS的选择相对于距离流和河流的距离(0-30米内的10.8%和8.4%,在30-60米范围内的10.8%)。在夏季,灰熊在收获的地区选择RZS,并避开了非收获区域。在雄性和女性之间的收获区域中选择RZS没有差异;然而,在非收获区域,与男性相比,女性避免了RZS并选择的RZS。这些结果,特别是在RZS大多由河岸缓冲区组成的收获区域中选择RZS的选择,表明河岸缓冲区在多次使用景观中提供有价值的灰熊栖息地。森林管理实践可以通过在鉴定的灰熊栖息地实施河岸缓冲区,并考虑灰熊栖息地使用RZS和河岸缓冲区作为河岸地区管理的一个组成部分来支持灰熊栖息地保护努力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号