...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery: official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract >Laparoscopic Transcystic Common Bile Duct Exploration in the Emergency Is as Effective and Safe as in Elective Setting
【24h】

Laparoscopic Transcystic Common Bile Duct Exploration in the Emergency Is as Effective and Safe as in Elective Setting

机译:紧急情况下的腹腔镜转生殖常见的胆汁管道探索如选修设施中的有效和安全

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Emergent laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) has been reported to be on the increase in some institutions, reflecting the growing confidence with the technique. However, no study has focused on the outcomes of LTCBDE in the non-elective setting. The aim of this study is to investigate whether LTCBDE can be performed effectively and safely in the emergency. Methods This is a retrospective study of 500 consecutive patients with choledocholithiasis subjected for LTCBDE at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires from January 2009 to January 2018. Procedures were classified according to the setting as emergent or elective. Demographic data and perioperative parameters were compared between groups. Results Throughout the period comprised, 500 patients were admitted for choledocholithiasis and gallstones. A single-step treatment combining LTCBDE and laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted: 211 (42.2%) were performed electively and the 289 (57.8%) as an emergency. There was no significant difference in the success rate of LTCBDE (93.9% versus 93.8%, p = 0.975) for the two groups. The operative time was slightly longer in the emergency group (122 +/- 63 versus 106 +/- 53 min, p = 0.002). Postoperative recovery was slower in the emergency group, as reflected by a higher rate of prolonged postoperative stay (21.1% vs 5.7%, p < .001). The rates of postoperative complications were similar between groups (2.8% vs 5.9%, p = 0.109). Conclusion Emergent LTCBDE can be performed with equivalent efficacy and morbidity when compared to an elective procedure. Patients undergoing emergent procedures have longer procedures and hospital stays.
机译:背景技术急产腹腔镜转生常见的胆汁管道勘探(LTCBDE)据报道,在一些机构的增加,反映了对该技术的增长信心。但是,没有研究过于非选择性环境中LTCBDE的结果。本研究的目的是研究LTCBDE是否可以在紧急情况下有效和安全地进行。方法这是从2009年1月至2018年1月到2018年1月的Italiano de Buenos Aires的LTCBDE进行LTCBDE的500名胆总管胆管患者的回顾性研究。根据现状或选修设定的程序分类。在组之间比较人口统计数据和围手术期参数。结果在整个含有500名患者的期间,为胆氰化和胆结石录取了500名患者。尝试了合并LTCBDE和腹腔镜胆囊切除术的单步处理:211(42.2%)选举,289(57.8%)作为紧急情况。这两组的LTCBDE成功率没有显着差异(93.9%,P = 0.975)。急诊组的操作时间略长于(122 +/- 63对106 +/- 53分钟,P = 0.002)。急诊组术后恢复较慢,正如术后停留的更高速率(21.1%Vs 5.7%,P <.001)。术后并发症的速率相似(2.8%Vs 5.9%,P = 0.109)。结论与选修程序相比,可以以等效功效和发病率进行突出LTCBDE。接受紧急程序的患者具有更长的程序和医院住宿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号