首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vibration and control: JVC >Stability and convergence analysis for different harmonic control algorithm implementations
【24h】

Stability and convergence analysis for different harmonic control algorithm implementations

机译:不同谐波控制算法实现的稳定性和收敛分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In many engineering systems there is a common requirement to isolate the supporting foundation from low frequency periodic machinery vibration sources. In such cases the vibration is mainly transmitted at the fundamental excitation frequency and its multiple harmonics. It is well known that passive approaches have poor performance at low frequencies and for this reason a number of active control technologies have been developed. For discrete frequencies disturbance rejection Harmonic Control (HC) techniques provide excellent performance. In the general case of variable speed engines or motors, the disturbance frequency changes with time, following the rotational speed of the engine or motor. For such applications, an important requirement for the control system is to converge to the optimal solution as rapidly as possible for all variations without altering the system's stability. For a variety of applications this may be difficult to achieve, especially when the disturbance frequency is close to a resonance peak and a small value of convergence gain is usually preferred to ensure closed-loop stability. This can lead to poor vibration isolation performance and long convergence times. In this paper, the performance of two recently developed HC algorithms are compared (in terms of both closed-loop stability and speed of convergence) in a vibration control application and for the case when the disturbance frequency is close to a resonant frequency. In earlier work it has been shown that both frequency domain HC algorithms can be represented by Linear Time Invariant (LTI) feedback compensators each designed to operate at the disturbance frequency. As a result, the convergence and stability analysis can be performed using the LTI representations with any suitable method from the LTI framework. For the example mentioned above, the speed of convergence provided by each algorithm is compared by determining the locations of the dominant closed-loop poles and stability analysis is performed using the open-loop frequency responses and the Nyquist criterion. The theoretical findings are validated through simulations and experimental analysis.
机译:在许多工程系统中,存在与低频周期机械振动源隔离支撑基础的常见要求。在这种情况下,振动主要以基本励磁频率和多种谐波传输。众所周知,被动方法在低频下具有差的性能,因此已经开发了许多主动控制技术。对于离散频率干扰抑制谐波控制(HC)技术提供出色的性能。在变速发动机或电动机的一般情况下,扰动频率随时间变化,按照发动机或电动机的转速。对于这种应用,对控制系统的重要要求是尽可能快地收敛到最佳解决方案,而不改变系统的稳定性。对于各种应用,这可能难以实现,特别是当干扰频率接近共振峰值并且通常优选收敛增益的小值以确保闭环稳定性。这可能导致振动隔离性能差和长收敛时间。在本文中,在振动控制应用中比较了两个最近开发的HC算法的性能(在闭环稳定性和收敛速度方面),并且当干扰频率接近谐振频率时,壳体的情况。在早期的工作中,已经表明,两个频域HC算法可以通过线性时间不变(LTI)反馈补偿器来表示,每个反馈补偿器均以在干扰频率下操作。结果,可以使用来自LTI框架的任何合适方法的LTI表示来执行收敛和稳定性分析。对于上述示例,通过确定所主题闭环极点的位置比较每种算法提供的收敛速度,并且使用开环频率响应和奈奎斯特标准来执行稳定性分析。通过模拟和实验分析验证了理论发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号