...
首页> 外文期刊>JPC Bulletin on Iron & Steel >How Do US Pediatric Residency Programs Teach and Evaluate Community Pediatrics and Advocacy Training?
【24h】

How Do US Pediatric Residency Programs Teach and Evaluate Community Pediatrics and Advocacy Training?

机译:美国儿科居住计划如何教学和评估社区儿科和宣传培训?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Objective In 2013, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education updated requirements for training in community pediatrics and advocacy in pediatric residency programs. In light of this update, the aim of this study was to better understand how community pediatrics is being taught and evaluated in pediatric residency programs in the United States. Methods Cross-sectional exploratory study using a Web-based survey of pediatric residency program directors in September 2014. Questions focused on teaching and evaluation of 10 community pediatrics competencies. Results Of 85 programs (43% response rate), 30% offered a separate training track and/or 6-block individualized curriculum in community pediatrics or advocacy. More than 75% required all residents to learn 7 of 10 competencies queried. Respondents in urban settings were more likely to teach care of special populations (P?=?.02) and public speaking (P??.01). Larger programs were more likely to teach (P?=?.04) and evaluate (P?=?.02) community-based research. Experiential learning and classroom-based didactics were the most frequent teaching methodologies. Many programs used multiple teaching methodologies for all competencies. Observation was the most frequent evaluation technique used; portfolio review and written reflection were also commonly reported. Conclusions Our findings show a strong emphasis on community pediatrics and advocacy teaching among responding US pediatric residency programs. Although respondents reported a variety of teaching and evaluation methods, there were few statistically significant differences between programs. ]]>
机译:<![CDATA [ 抽象 目标 2013年,研究生医学教育的认可委员会更新了社区儿科和宣传儿科居住计划的培训要求。鉴于这种更新,本研究的目的是更好地了解社区儿科在美国的儿科居住计划中如何教授和评估。 方法 2014年9月利用基于网络儿科居住计划董事的横截面探索性研究。侧重于教学和评估10个社区儿科能力。 结果 85节目(43%的响应率),30%在社区儿科或ADVOC中提供单独的培训赛道和/或6个块个性化课程ACY。超过75%的人要求所有居民学习10个验证的10个能力。城市环境中的受访者更有可能教授特殊人群的护理( p ?= 02)和公开演讲( p ?&lt ;?01)。更大的节目更有可能教导( p ?= 04)和评估( p ?=?= 02)社区为基础研究。体验学习和基于课堂的教学是最常见的教学方法。许多程序使用了所有能力的多种教学方法。观察是使用的最常见的评估技术;还报告了投资组合审查和书面反思。 结论 我们的调查结果表明,在响应中强调社区儿科和宣传教学表明美国儿科居住计划。虽然受访者报告了各种教学和评估方法,但程序之间的统计学上显着差异很大。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号