首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Turbulence >Effects of speed-control measures on the safety of unsignalized midblock street crossings in China
【24h】

Effects of speed-control measures on the safety of unsignalized midblock street crossings in China

机译:速度控制措施对我国无罪化中尔街道安全的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different speed-control measures on the safety of unsignalized midblock street crossings.Methods: In China, it is quite difficult to obtain traffic crash and conflict data for pedestrians using such crossings, mainly due to the lack of traffic data management and organizational issues. In light of this, the proposed method did not rely on such data, but considered vehicle speed, which is a leading contributing factor of pedestrian safety at mid blocks. To evaluate the speed reduction effects at different locations, the research team utilized the following methods in this study: (1) testing speed differenceson the basis of the collected data, statistical analysis is conducted to test the speed differences between upstream and crosswalk, upstream and downstream, and downstream and crosswalk; and (2) mean distribution deviationthis value is calculated by taking the difference in cumulative speed distributions for the two different samples just mentioned. In order to better understand the variation of speed reduction effects at different distances from speed-control facilities, data were collected from six types of speed-control measures with a visual range of 60 m.Results: The results showed that speed humps, transverse rumble strips, and speed bumps were effective in reducing vehicle speeds. Among them speed humps performed the best, with reductions of 21.1% and 20.0% from upstream location (25.01 km/h) and downstream location (24.66 km/h) to pedestrian crosswalk (19.73 km/h), respectively. By contrast, the speed reduction effects were minimal for stop and yield signs, flashing yellow lights, and crossings without treatment.Conclusions: Consequently, in order to reduce vehicle speeds and improve pedestrian safety at mid blocks, several speed-control measures such as speed humps, speed bumps, and transverse rumble strips are recommended to be deployed in the vicinity of pedestrian crosswalks.
机译:目的:这项研究的主要目标是评估不同速度控制措施对无罪化中间街道交叉的安全的影响。方法:在中国,使用这种交叉口获得行人的交通崩溃和冲突数据是非常困难的,主要是由于缺乏交通数据管理和组织问题。鉴于此,所提出的方法不依赖于这些数据,而是考虑到车速,这是中间块处行人安全的主要贡献因素。为了评估不同地点的减速效果,研究团队在本研究中使用以下方法:(1)测试速度差异差异,进行统计分析,以测试上游和人行横道之间的速度差异,上游和人行横道之间的速度差异。下游,下游和人行横道; (2)平均分布偏差是通过对刚才提到的两个不同样本的累积速度分布的差异来计算。为了更好地了解从速度控制设施在不同距离处的减速效应的变化,从6种类型的速度控制措施收集数据,视觉范围为60 m.results:结果表明速度驼峰,横向隆隆声条带,速度凸起可有效降低车速。其中速度驼峰表现最佳,减少21.1%,从上游位置(25.01 km / h)和下游位置(24.66 km / h)分别到行人人行横道(19.73 km / h)。相比之下,减速效应对于停止和屈服迹象,闪烁黄色灯和无需治疗的交叉点来最小.Conclusions:因此,为了降低车辆速度并在中间块处提高行人安全性,速度的几种速度控制措施建议在行人人行横道附近部署驼峰,速度凸起和横向隆隆条。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号