...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis: JTH >Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis among patients recently hospitalized for acute infectious diseases: a subgroup analysis of the MAGELLAN MAGELLAN study
【24h】

Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis among patients recently hospitalized for acute infectious diseases: a subgroup analysis of the MAGELLAN MAGELLAN study

机译:Rivaroxaban在患者中血栓血管抑制患者最近住院治疗急性传染病:麦哲伦麦哲伦研究的亚组分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Essentials Net benefit of venous thromboprophylaxis (VTE) in patients hospitalized for infections is unknown. MAGELLAN trial subgroup analysis was performed for patients hospitalized for acute infectious diseases. At day 35, prolonged rivaroxaban prophylaxis reduced VTE compared to enoxaparin (4.2% vs. 6.6%). Rivaroxaban prophylaxis reduced VTE in patients hospitalized for active lung infections. Summary Background Despite the well‐established association between infection and venous thromboembolism ( VTE ), there are few data specifically assessing the efficacy and safety of the VTE prophylaxis strategies for patients hospitalized for acute infectious diseases. Objectives To estimate the incidence of VTE and bleeding outcomes, comparing prolonged prophylaxis with rivaroxaban 10 mg daily for 35 days with enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 10 days. Patients/Methods A subgroup analysis of patients hospitalized for acute infectious diseases in the MAGELLAN trial was performed. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of asymptomatic proximal or symptomatic VTE at days 10 and 35. The principal safety outcome was the composite of major or clinically relevant non‐major bleeding. Results Three thousand one hundred and seventy‐three patients with acute infectious diseases leading to hospitalization were randomized to either rivaroxaban ( n = 1585) or enoxaparin/placebo ( n = 1588), and received at least one dose of study medication. At day 10, primary composite efficacy outcomes did not differ between prophylaxis strategies (rivaroxaban, 2.7%; and enoxaparin, 3.7%). At day 35, there were fewer VTE events with rivaroxaban (4.2%) than with enoxaparin (6.6%) (relative risk [ RR ] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [ CI ] 0.45–0.92). Patients with pulmonary infections randomized to rivaroxaban had a lower incidence of VTE both at 10 days ( RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.28–0.90) and at 35 days ( RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33–0.87). Primary safety outcome events were increased with rivaroxaban ( RR 2.42, 95% CI 1.60–3.66). Conclusions Prolonged rivaroxaban prophylaxis reduced the incidence of VTE in patients hospitalized for acute infectious diseases, particularly those involving the lungs. Efficacy benefits were, in part, offset by bleeding outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT 00571649.
机译:为感染住院患者患者静脉血栓抑制(VTE)的必要性净利润是未知的。对住院患者进行急性传染病的患者进行Magellan试验亚组分析。在第35天,与烯脱嗪(4.2%vs.6.6%)相比,延长的蓖麻预防vte降低了VTE。 Rivaroxaban预防患者治疗活性肺感染的患者的VTE。摘要背景尽管感染和静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)之间的良好关联,但数据很少地评估VTE预防患者为急性传染病的患者的效果和安全性。估计VTE和出血结果的发生率,将延长预防与蓖麻毒素10mg的延长预防,每天35天,每天40毫克为10天。患者/方法进行麦哲伦试验中急性传染病住院患者的亚组分析。初级疗效结果是在第10天和第35天无症状近端或症状VTE的复合。主要安全结果是主要或临床相关的非重大出血的复合材料。结果三千一百七十三名急性传染病患者导致住院治疗的患者被随机转移到罗昔帕班(n = 1585)或烯脱蒿素/安慰剂(n = 1588),并接受至少一剂研究药物。在第10天,预防策略(Rivaroxaban,2.7%;和烯脱蒿,3.7%)之间的原发性综合疗效结果没有差异。在第35天,与亚诺帕林(6.6%)(相对风险[RR] 0.64; 95%置信区间[CI] 0.45-0.92),罗西沙巴林(4.2%)较少。患有肺氧化物的肺部感染的患者在10天(RR 0.50,95%CI 0.28-0.90)和35天(RR 0.54,95%CI 0.33-0.87)下均具有较低的VTE发病率。利用蓖麻油(RR 2.42,95%CI 1.60-3.66)增加了主要安全结果事件。结论延长的rivaroxaban预防减少了住院急性传染病的患者VTE的发病率,特别是涉及肺部的患者。有效益处部分是通过出血结果抵消。 ClinicalTrials.gov数字:NCT 00571649。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号