...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of cardiovascular drugs: drugs, devices, and other interventions >Erratum to: Comparison of the phase III clinical trial designs of novel oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: Implications for clinical practice (American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs (2014) 14, (111-127) DOI: 10.1007/s40256-013-0062-z)
【24h】

Erratum to: Comparison of the phase III clinical trial designs of novel oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: Implications for clinical practice (American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs (2014) 14, (111-127) DOI: 10.1007/s40256-013-0062-z)

机译:勘误至:新型口服抗凝药与华法林治疗非瓣膜性房颤的III期临床试验设计的比较:对临床实践的意义(美国心血管药物杂志(2014)14,(111-127)DOI:10.1007 / s40256 -013-0062-z)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We assessed the diagnostic performance of stress- and rest-dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) and their incremental value when used with coronary CT angiography (CCTA) compared with combined invasive coronary angiography (ICA)/cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis causing a myocardial perfusion defect. Forty patients (30 men; mean age, 63.4 ± 8.8 years) with known or suspected coronary artery disease detected by CCTA underwent stress- and rest-DECT, CMR, and ICA. DECT iodine maps were compared with CMR on a per-segment and per-vessel basis. Diagnostic value of CCTA was assessed on a per-vessel basis before and after stress- and rest-DECT and compared to that of ICA/CMR. Compared to CMR, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of rest-DECT for detecting segment (vessel)-based perfusion defects were 29 % (46 %), 88 % (79 %), 56 % (61 %), and 70 % (67 %), respectively. Corresponding values using stress-DECT were 73 % (94 %), 83 % (74 %), 70 % (72 %), and 85 % (95 %), respectively. There was fair (κ = 0.39) agreement between rest- and stress-DECT iodine maps in identifying segments with perfusion defects. Compared with the ICA/CMR for identifying hemodynamically significant stenoses, per-vessel territory sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of CCTA were 91, 56, 55, and 91 %, respectively; those using CCTA/rest-DECT were 42, 83, 59, and 70 %, respectively; and those using CCTA/stress-DECT were 87, 79, 71, and 91 %, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve decreased from 0.74 to 0.62 (P = 0.06) using CCTA/rest-DECT but increased to 0.83 (P = 0.02) using CCTA/stress-DECT. Stress-DECT has incremental value when used with CCTA for detecting hemodynamically significant stenoses.
机译:我们评估了压力和静息双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)的诊断性能及其与冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)结合有创冠状动脉血管造影(ICA)/心血管磁共振(CMR)进行检测时的​​增量值血液动力学显着狭窄,引起心肌灌注缺陷。通过CCTA检测到已知或疑似冠心病的四十名患者(30名男性,平均年龄为63.4±8.8岁)接受了压力和静息DECT,CMR和ICA。将DECT碘图与CMR进行了逐段和逐血管比较。在压力和静息DECT之前和之后,按血管评估CCTA的诊断价值,并与ICA / CMR进行比较。与CMR相比,rest-DECT检测基于节段(血管)的灌注缺陷的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为29%(46%),88%(79%) ,56%(61%)和70%(67%)。使用Stress-DECT的相应值分别为73%(94%),83%(74%),70%(72%)和85%(95%)。在确定具有灌注缺陷的节段时,静息DECT和应激DECT碘图之间存在公平的(κ= 0.39)一致性。与ICA / CMR相比,CCTA的每个血管区域敏感性,特异性,PPV和NPV分别为91%,56%,55%和91%。使用CCTA / rest-DECT的比例分别为42%,83%,59%和70%;使用CCTA / stress-DECT的用户分别为87%,79%,71%和91%。使用CCTA / rest-DECT时,接收器工作特性曲线下的面积从0.74降低至0.62(P = 0.06),而使用CCTA / stress-DECT时,则增大至0.83(P = 0.02)。当与CCTA一起使用以检测血液动力学显着的狭窄时,Stress-DECT具有增量值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号