...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology: JEADV >A practical decision‐tree model to predict complexity of reconstructive surgery after periocular basal cell carcinoma excision
【24h】

A practical decision‐tree model to predict complexity of reconstructive surgery after periocular basal cell carcinoma excision

机译:一种实用的决策树模型,以预测围眼基础细胞癌切除后重建手术复杂性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Background Periocular basal cell carcinomas (pBCC) have unpredictable growth. The authors seek to derive a decision rule for predicting surgical complexity in pBCC. Materials and Methods This study was conducted at two centres in New Zealand from September 2010 to November 2015. Baseline demographic information and an initial assessment of operative complexity (a four‐point grading scale) were collected. Assessment of operative complexity was repeated at the time of reconstruction. Univariate analysis was applied to identify the associative factors and supervised machine learning was used to determine the best predictive models to construct a clinical decision rule. Results A total of 156 patients and 156 periocular BCC were analysed. Univariate analysis revealed that older age, recurrent skin cancer, large tumour size, being a public patient and high complexity at pre‐operative assessment were associated with high actual operative complexity. Tumour histology was not associated with more complex surgery. Machine learning analyses revealed that Naive Bayesian classifier was able to distinguish surgical complexity with an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ( AUC ) of 0.854 (95% CI: 0.762–0.946) whereas a simpler, alternating decision tree ( ADT ) that used only three clinical variables achieved an AUC of 0.853 (95% CI: 0.739–0.931). The ADT model was 10.1 times more likely to correctly identify a high complexity case. The three predictive variables were pre‐operative assessment of complexity (high vs. low), surgical delays [early (75 days) or delayed (≥75 days)], and tumour size [small (14 mm), or large (≥14 mm)]. For the subgroup with large tumours but low initial assessed complexity, late surgery was associated with a 6.7‐fold increase in risk of high‐risk surgery. Conclusions A simple, three‐variable risk stratification system was able to predict the operative complexity of pBCC .
机译:摘要背景外观基础细胞癌(PBCC)具有不可预测的生长。作者试图导出预测PBCC的手术复杂性的决策规则。本研究于2010年9月至2015年11月在新西兰的两个中心进行了本研究。收集基线人口统计信息和初步评估手术复杂性(四点分级规模)。在重建时重复评估手术复杂性的评估。应用单变量分析来确定联想因素和监督机器学习用于确定构建临床决策规则的最佳预测模型。结果共分析了156名患者和156例外观解释。单变量分析表明,年龄较大的年龄,复发性皮肤癌,大肿瘤大小,是公共患者和在术前评估的高度复杂性与高实际操作复杂性有关。肿瘤组织学与更复杂的手术无关。机器学习分析显示,Naive Bayesian分类器能够将手术复杂性与0.854(95%CI:0.762-0.946)的接收器操作特性曲线(AUC)的平均区域区分开来区分外科复杂性(95%CI:0.762-0.946),而使用的更简单,交替的决策树(ADT)只有三种临床变量达到0.853的AUC(95%CI:0.739-0.931)。正确识别高复杂性案例的ADT模型是10.1倍。三种预测变量是复杂性(高与低)的预操作评估,手术延迟[早期(&75天)或延迟(≥75天)]和肿瘤大小[小(& 14 mm),或大(≥14毫米)]。对于具有大肿瘤的亚组,但初始评估复杂性低,晚期手术与高风险手术的风险增加6.7倍。结论一种简单的三变风险分层系统能够预测PBCC的操作复杂性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号