首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology: JEADV >Cross‐reactivity in beta‐lactams after a non‐immediate cutaneous adverse reaction: experience of a reference centre for toxic bullous diseases and severe cutaneous adverse reactions
【24h】

Cross‐reactivity in beta‐lactams after a non‐immediate cutaneous adverse reaction: experience of a reference centre for toxic bullous diseases and severe cutaneous adverse reactions

机译:在非立即皮肤不良反应后β-内酰胺的交叉反应性:有毒大疱性疾病的参考中心的经验和严重的皮肤不良反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Cross‐reactivity among beta‐lactam antibiotics ( BL ) is essentially reported in immediate hypersensitivity. Objectives To evaluate cross‐reactivity beyond BL s in patients with non‐immediate cutaneous adverse drug reaction (non‐immediate CADR ) managed in a dermatology reference centre of toxic bullous and severe CADR s. Patients/Materials/Methods We conducted a retrospective single‐centre study in consecutive patients consulting between 2010 and 2018 with an active BL ‐suspected non‐immediate CADR and explored by cutaneous tests [patch tests ( PT ) and intradermal tests (P‐ IDR )] for at least three penicillin's subclasses and amino‐ and non‐amino‐cephalosporins (at least one aminocephalosporin). Cross‐reactivity among subclasses was investigated for patients with positive tests. Results We included 56 patients, among whom 46 amoxicillin‐suspected were and seven cephalosporin‐suspected. Twenty‐nine had severe CADR , and 27 had non‐immediate maculopapular exanthema ( MPE ). Twenty‐two had positive tests (18 for AS and four for CS ). Among the 18 positive amoxicillin‐suspected, 10 (55.6%) showed cross‐reactivity with one or more other BL : 9 (50%) with another penicillin and 3 (16.5%) with a non‐aminocephalosporin. No amoxicillin‐ or cephalosporin‐suspected patient showed cross‐reactivity with aztreonam or carbapenems. P‐ IDR showed cross‐reactivity only once. Conclusion After a suspected BL ‐induced non‐immediate CADR , a large allergologic exploration is needed to confirm the diagnosis and evaluate cross‐reactivity. In our population including cases of severe CADR s and MPE with late delay of onset, cross‐reactivity was frequent and PT was sufficient to this purpose. The frequent cross‐reactivity among penicillins encourages stopping this whole family and to test cephalosporins, aztreonam and carbapenems for which cross‐allergies are rarer.
机译:摘要β-内酰胺抗生素(BL)中的背景交叉反应基本上以立即的超敏反应报告。目标是在皮肤病学参考中心管理的非立即皮肤不良药物反应(非立即CADR)中,评估BL S之外的交叉反应性。患者/材料/方法我们在连续患者中进行了回顾性单中心研究,2010年至2018年间咨询,积极的BL-Suspected非立即CADR,并通过皮肤测试探索[贴片测试(PT)和皮内测试(P-IDR) ]对于至少三种青霉素的亚类和氨基和非氨基 - 头孢菌素(至少一个氨基孢子蛋白)。针对阳性测试患者研究了亚类之间的交叉反应性。结果我们包括56名患者,其中46名令人毛骨悚然的患者患有46名令人毛骨悚然的患者和七位孢子蛋白可疑。二十九次具有严重的CADR,27例具有非立即的MAROPAPULAL EXANTHEMA(MPE)。二十二有阳性测试(CS为18个等级)。在18个阳性阿莫西林可疑的中,10(55.6%)显示与一种或多种其他BL:9(50%)的交叉反应性,另一种青霉素,3(16.5%),具有非氨基孢子蛋白。没有阿莫西林或头孢菌素的疑似患者与阿兹特诺姆或碳癌蛋白酶表现出交叉反应性。 P-IDR仅显示了一次交叉反应性。结论在疑似BL-诱导的非立即CADR后,需要大致的过敏性勘探来证实诊断和评估交叉反应性。在我们的人群中,包括严重的CADR S和MPE具有晚期发作的患者,交叉反应性频繁,PT足以此目的。青霉素之间的频繁交叉反应促使停止这种全部家庭并测试头孢菌素,阿兹特康姆和碳粉植物,交叉过敏率罕见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号