首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the History of Biology >Building a Science of Animal Minds: Lloyd Morgan, Experimentation, and Morgan's Canon
【24h】

Building a Science of Animal Minds: Lloyd Morgan, Experimentation, and Morgan's Canon

机译:建立一种动物思想科学:洛伊德摩根,实验和摩根的佳能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Conwy Lloyd Morgan (1852-1936) is widely regarded as the father of modern comparative psychology. Yet, Morgan initially had significant doubts about whether a genuine science of comparative psychology was even possible, only later becoming more optimistic about our ability to make reliable inferences about the mental capacities of non-human animals. There has been a fair amount of disagreement amongst scholars of Morgan's work about the nature, timing, and causes of this shift in Morgan's thinking. We argue that Morgan underwent two quite different shifts of attitude towards the proper practice of comparative psychology. The first was a qualified acceptance of the Romanesian approach to comparative psychology that he had initially criticized. The second was a shift away from Romanes' reliance on systematizing anecdotal evidence of animal intelligence towards an experimental approach, focused on studying the development of behaviour. We emphasize the role of Morgan's evolving epistemological views in bringing about the first shift - in particular, his philosophy of science. We emphasize the role of an intriguing but overlooked figure in the history of comparative psychology in explaining the second shift, T. Mann Jones, whose correspondence with Morgan provided an important catalyst for Morgan's experimental turn, particularly the special focus on development. We also shed light on the intended function of Morgan's Canon, the methodological principle for which Morgan is now mostly known. The Canon can only be properly understood by seeing it in the context of Morgan's own unique experimental vision for comparative psychology.
机译:康威·洛伊德摩根(1852-1936)被广泛认为是现代比较心理学的父亲。然而,摩根最初对比较心理学的真正科学甚至可能的真正科学造成了重大疑虑,只有后来对我们对非人动物心理能力进行可靠推断的能力更为乐观。摩根在摩根思想中这种转变的自然,时间和原因的学者之间存在相当多的分歧。我们认为摩根在对比较心理学的适当实践方面做出了两次相当不同的态度。首先是对他最初批评的比较心理学的罗马人方法的合格接受。第二个是远离罗马人依赖于系统化动物智能的轶事证据的转变,专注于研究行为的发展。我们强调摩根在发展第一班的发展中的作用 - 特别是他的科学哲学。我们强调有趣但忽视了比较心理学史上的角色,解释了摩根的第二班,其对应于摩根的实验转弯的重要催化剂,特别是对发展的特别关注。我们还阐明了摩根佳能的预期功能,现在摩根的方法原则主要是众所周知的。只有在摩根在摩根的独特实验视觉中对比较心理学的背景下看到它,才能妥善了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号