首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : >An investigation of single-domain and multidomain medication and adverse drug event relation extraction from electronic health record notes using advanced deep learning models
【24h】

An investigation of single-domain and multidomain medication and adverse drug event relation extraction from electronic health record notes using advanced deep learning models

机译:使用先进的深度学习模型对单结构域和多域药物药物和不良药物事件关系的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of advanced deep learning models (eg, capsule network [CapNet], adversarial training [ADV]) for single-domain and multidomain relation extraction from electronic health record (EHR) notes. Materials and Methods: We built multiple deep learning models with increased complexity, namely a multilayer perceptron (MLP) model and a CapNet model for single-domain relation extraction and fully shared (FS), shared-private (SP), and adversarial training (ADV) modes for multidomain relation extraction. Our models were evaluated in 2 ways: first, we compared our models using our expert-annotated cancer (the MADE1.0 corpus) and cardio corpora; second, we compared our models with the systems in the MADE1.0 and i2b2 challenges. Results: Multidomain models outperform single-domain models by 0.7%-1.4% in F1 (t test P<.05), but the results of FS, SP, and ADV modes are mixed. Our results show that the MLP model generally outperforms the CapNet model by 0.1%-1.0% in F1. In the comparisons with other systems, the CapNet model achieves the state-of-the-art result (87.2% in F1) in the cancer corpus and the MLP model generally outperforms MedEx in the cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and i2b2 corpora. Conclusions: Our MLP or CapNet model generally outperforms other state-of-the-art systems in medication and adverse drug event relation extraction. Multidomain models perform better than single-domain models. However, neither the SP nor the ADV mode can always outperform the FS mode significantly. Moreover, the CapNet model is not superior to the MLP model for our corpora.
机译:目的:我们旨在评估先进的深度学习模型(例如,胶囊网络[Capnet],对电子健康记录(EHR)笔记的多域和多麦田关系提取的有效性。材料和方法:我们建立了复杂性增加的多个深度学习模型,即多层的Perceptron(MLP)模型和用于单域关系提取和完全共享(FS),共享 - 私人(SP)和对抗培训的CAPNET模型( adv)多麦田关系提取模式。我们的模型以2种方式进行评估:首先,我们使用我们的专家注释的癌症(制造了1.0语料库)和有氧Cotora比较了我们的模型;其次,我们将模型与制造1.0和I2B2挑战中的系统进行了比较。结果:多麦田模型在F1(T检测P <0.05)中以0.7%-1.4%优于0.7%-1.4%,但混合FS,SP和ADV模式的结果。我们的结果表明,在F1中,MLP模型通常以0.1%-1.0%优于Capnet型号。在与其他系统的比较中,CAPNET模型在癌症语料库中实现了最先进的结果(F1中的87.2%),MLP模型通常优于癌症,心血管疾病和I2B2 Corpora中的Medex。结论:我们的MLP或CAPNET模型通常在药物和不良药物事件关系提取中优于其他最先进的系统。多麦田模型比单域模型更好。但是,SP和ADV模式都不能显着优于FS模式。此外,CAPNET模型不优于我们的公司MLP模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号