首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Radiology: JACR >Time to Talk: Can Radiologists Improve Follow-Up of Abdominal Imaging Findings Indeterminate for Malignancy by Initiating Verbal Communication?
【24h】

Time to Talk: Can Radiologists Improve Follow-Up of Abdominal Imaging Findings Indeterminate for Malignancy by Initiating Verbal Communication?

机译:谈话时间:可以通过启动口头沟通来改善腹部成像结果的随访,不确定恶性肿瘤?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PurposeThe aims of this study were to examine the association between radiologist-initiated verbal communication for abdominal imaging findings indeterminate for malignancy and receipt of relevant outpatient follow-up imaging and to evaluate the proportion of findings that progress from indeterminate to suspicious for malignancy. MethodsUsing a mandatory standardized assessment coding system, 727 eligible outpatient abdominal CT, MRI, and ultrasound studies performed between July 1, 2013, and January 31, 2014, were identified. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between radiologist-initiated verbal communication and receipt of relevant outpatient imaging follow-up, adjusted for patient, ordering physician, interpreting radiologist, and imaging variables. ResultsSixty-two percent of patients (451 of 727) with imaging findings indeterminate for malignancy received relevant outpatient imaging follow-up. Radiologist-initiated verbal communication occurred in 4.8% of cases (35 of 727). Radiologist-initiated verbal communication (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-5.87) and existing cancer diagnosis (OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 2.11-4.26) were associated with a higher likelihood of receiving relevant imaging follow-up. Compared with those whose imaging studies were ordered by clinicians in a medical specialty, patients with studies ordered by clinicians in surgical (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49-0.99) or other (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 20.24-0.83) specialties were less likely to receive relevant imaging follow-up. Progression of findings from indeterminate to suspicious?for malignancy occurred in 5.4% of cases and was not associated with radiologist-initiated verbal communication. ConclusionsRadiologist-initiated verbal communication increases the likelihood that patients receive outpatient imaging follow-up for abdominal findings indeterminate for malignancy. Progression of these findings is relatively infrequent.
机译:本研究的目的是检查放射科医师出版的腹部成像结果的言语交流之间的关联,不确定恶性肿瘤和收到相关的门诊后续成像,并评估从不确定的结果对恶性肿瘤的比例进行评估。 Motietys,在2013年7月1日至2014年7月1日至2014年1月31日之间进行了强制性标准化评估编码系统,727个符合条件的门诊腹部CT,MRI和超声研究。多变量逻辑回归用于评估放射科医师的口头通信和接收相关门诊成像后续的关联,针对患者,订购医师,解释放射科学和成像变量进行调整。结果 - 百分之二的患者(451 of 727)具有成像结果对于恶性肿瘤不确定,得到相关的门诊成像随访。放射科医生启动的口头沟通发生在4.8%的病例(第35条第727条中)。放射学家 - 发起的口头通信(差距[或],2.45; 95%置信区间[CI],1.02-5.87)和现有的癌症诊断(或3.00; 95%CI,2.11-4.26)与更高的可能性有关接受相关的成像随访。与临床医生在医学专业中订购的成像研究的人相比,临床医生患者在外科医生(或0.70; 95%CI,0.49-0.99)或其他(或0.44; 95%CI,20.24-0.83) )专业人员不太可能接受相关的影像动作随访。从不确定到可疑的调查结果进展?恶性肿瘤发生在5.4%的病例中,并且与放射科医师发起的口头沟通无关。结论发起的口头沟通增加了患者接受腹腔治疗的患者的可能性,对于恶性肿瘤不确定。这些发现的进展相对罕见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号