首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Stored Products Research >The efficacy of sieving, filth flotation and Tullgren heat extraction for detecting various developmental stages of Tribolium castaneum and Ephestia kuehniella in samples of wheat grain, flour and semolina
【24h】

The efficacy of sieving, filth flotation and Tullgren heat extraction for detecting various developmental stages of Tribolium castaneum and Ephestia kuehniella in samples of wheat grain, flour and semolina

机译:筛分,污水浮选和脱肉格热萃取检测小麦籽粒,面粉和粗面粉样品中柴油瘤和仇外虾氏菌氏菌的各种发育阶段的疗效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A prerequisite for effective pest risk management in food is the unbiased interpretation of results obtained by various detection methods. In this study we compared the sensitivity of filth flotation tests, sieving and heat extraction in Tullgren-Berlese funnels for detecting insect contaminants. Samples of wheat grain, flour and semolina were contaminated with eggs, juveniles and adults of Tribolium castaneum, and eggs or larvae of Ephestia kuehniella. Calibration methods were applied for every detection method, and total and sample recoveries and detection limits were calculated for each method, food substrate and contaminant type. The tested contaminants were not detected on a qualitative level by any single technique, instead a combination of techniques was necessary for detection. Sieving was the method with the highest total recoveries, ranging from 90 to 100%. Filth flotation was a uniquely effective for egg detection, with total recoveries ranging from 65 to 95%. The extraction of adults and larvae of both species in Tullgren-Berlese funnels failed in semolina and flour, and was of very limited success in grain. The detection limits for sieving were from 1 to 16 contaminants/kg commodity. The detection limits for filth flotation were from 224 to 508 eggs, and 58 to 507 adults or larvae/kg commodity. The sample recoveries were usually influenced by sample size, species, stadium and their interactions, and indicated how to optimize method protocols. The calibration of methods provided estimates of contaminant densities different from those obtained without calibration. Our work revealed that some currently used methods are not sensitive enough to detect all stages of insect pests, or in some cases, low levels of pest infestation. This lack of sensitivity potentially enables the infested cereal food product to continue down the food processing chain even after laboratory inspection.
机译:在食物中有效害虫风险管理的先决条件是通过各种检测方法获得的结果的解释。在这项研究中,我们比较了Tullgren-Berlese Funnels的污水浮选试验,筛分和热提取的灵敏度来检测昆虫污染物。小麦籽粒,面粉和粗面粉样品被鸡蛋,青少年和成人污染了鸡汤,鸡蛋或仇外鸟类Kuehniella的鸡蛋或幼虫。施加校准方法对每种检测方法施加,针对每种方法,食物基质和污染物类型计算总和样品回收率和检测限。通过任何单一技术在定性水平上未检测到测试的污染物,而是检测需要的技术的组合。筛分是总回收率最高的方法,范围为90%至100%。污物浮选是卵检测唯一有效的,总回收率范围为65至95%。在佐尔格伦 - 伯勒斯鲁内克尔斯的两种种类中的成人和幼虫的提取在粗面粉和面粉中失败,并且在谷物中的成功非常有限。筛分的检测限为1至16个污染物/千克商品。污水浮选的检测限为224至508个鸡蛋,58至507种成人或幼虫/千克商品。样品回收通常受样本大小,物种,体育场及其相互作用的影响,并指出了如何优化方法协议。方法的校准提供了与没有校准的污染密度不同的污染密度的估计。我们的工作表明,一些目前使用的方法不足以检测昆虫害虫的所有阶段,或在某些情况下,害虫患病程度低。这种缺乏敏感性可能使侵染性谷物食品能够在实验室检查之后继续沿着食品加工链。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号