首页> 外文期刊>Journal of robotic surgery >Fluorescence-guided selective arterial clamping during RAPN provides better early functional outcomes based on renal scan compared to standard clamping
【24h】

Fluorescence-guided selective arterial clamping during RAPN provides better early functional outcomes based on renal scan compared to standard clamping

机译:与标准夹紧相比,RAPN期间的荧光导向选择性动脉夹紧提供了基于肾扫描的更好的早期功能性结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To compare the functional and operative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with selective arterial clamping guided by near infrared fluorescence imaging (NIRF-RAPN) versus a cohort of patients who underwent standard RAPN without selective arterial clamping (S-RAPN). 62 consecutive patients underwent RAPN from January 2016 to May 2017: the last 20 patients underwent NIRF-RAPN. Preoperative and postoperative renal scan at 1 month were performed to evaluate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of the operated renal unit and total function. Functional and operative outcomes of cases were compared with a cohort of 42 patients undergoing S-RAPN. Selective clamping was performed in 15 patients (75%), whereas five (25%) cases were converted to S-RAPN, due to incomplete ischemic appearance of the tumor after selective clamping. Median tumor diameter was 40 mm in both groups. Median selective clamping was 24 min in both groups. Operative time (206' vs 190') and blood loss (200 vs 170 cc) were comparable. No major complications have been reported in the NIRF-RAPN group, whereas three acute hemorrhages with embolization were found in the S-RAPN group. The analysis of renal scan data revealed that a greater loss of GFR in the operated renal unit was observed after S-RAPN compared to NIRF-RAPN [21.5% vs. 5.5%; p = 0.046], as well as total GFR loss [8% vs 0%; p = 0.007]. The use of NIRF imaging was associated with improved short-term renal functional outcomes compared to RAPN without selective arterial clamping. To our knowledge, this is the first comparative study analyzing the GFR obtained from renal scan.
机译:比较机器人辅助部分肾切除术的功能和操作结果与近红外荧光成像(NIRF-RAPN)引导的选择性动脉钳位与没有选择性动脉夹紧的标准RAPN的患者(S-RAPN)。 62名连续患者从2016年1月到2017年5月接受了RAPN:过去20名患者接受了NIRF-RAPN。进行1个月的术前和术后肾扫描,以评估操作肾单位的肾小球过滤速率(GFR)和总功能。将病例的功能和手术结果与42例患者进行了比较了S-RAPN。选择性夹紧在15名患者(75%)中进行,而在选择性夹紧后肿瘤的不完全缺血外观,将五(25%)病例转化为S-RAPN。两组中间肿瘤直径为40mm。两组中间有选择性夹紧是24分钟。操作时间(206'Vs 190')和失血(200 Vs 170 CC)是可比的。 NIRF-RAPN组没有报告主要并发症,而在S-RAPN组中发现了三种急性出血的栓塞。肾扫描数据的分析显示,与NIRF-RAPN相比,在S-RAPN相比,在S-RAPN后观察到在操作肾单位中更大的GFR损失[21.5%vs.5.5%; P = 0.046],以及总GFR损失[8%vs 0%; p = 0.007]。与RAPN相比,使用NIRF成像的使用与没有选择性动脉夹紧的RAPN改善的短期肾功能效果相关。据我们所知,这是第一个分析从肾扫描获得的GFR的比较研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号