首页> 外文期刊>Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases: The official journal of National Stroke Association >Comparisons of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Penumbra, Infarct, and Normal Brain Regions in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Confirmatory Data Using Bootstrap Confidence Intervals, Analysis of Variance, and Analysis of Means
【24h】

Comparisons of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Penumbra, Infarct, and Normal Brain Regions in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Confirmatory Data Using Bootstrap Confidence Intervals, Analysis of Variance, and Analysis of Means

机译:急性缺血性脑卒中中半影,梗死和正常脑区表观扩散系数值的比较:使用自举置信区间的确认数据,方差分析和分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Objective: There is no consensus about apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in acute stroke regions that could be used by clinicians in a day-to-day clinical practice; regional measures using confidence intervals (CIs) and a graphic representation of means are scarce in the literature. Our aim in this study was to compare ADC values in infarct, penumbra, and normal brain regions in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods: This is a retrospective study of 100 magnetic resonance imaging data sets from AIS patients. ADC values were measured in the infarct, penumbra, and normal regions. Three hundred measurements underwent 1-way analysis of variance, analysis of means, and calculation of 95% and 84% CIs. Results: There was a statistically significant difference at the P level less than.025 in ADC values for the 3 regions (F[2, 297] = 168.039, P <= .001), with no overlap of the CIs for the means among the regions: normal brain (mean [M] = .847, standard deviation [SD] = .103, 95% CI: .825-. 866), infarct (M = .533, SD = .157, 95% CI: .501-. 563), and penumbra (M = .764, SD = .110, 95% CI: .740-. 787). Conclusions: ADC values might be used as reference data in acute stroke-specific populations; CIs would provide radiologists and clinicians with additional quantitative tools to evaluate penumbra, infarct, and normal brain tissue and to tailor follow-up and treatment options for selected patients.
机译:背景和目的:临床医师在日常临床实践中可以使用急性行程区域中表观扩散系数(ADC)值的共识;使用置信区间(CIS)的区域措施和手段的图形表示在文献中是稀缺的。我们本研究的目的是将ADC值与急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者患者的梗塞,半影和正常脑区域进行比较。方法:这是来自AIS患者的100个磁共振成像数据集的回顾性研究。在梗塞,半影和普通区域中测量ADC值。三百次测量完成的差异,手段分析和95%和84%CIS的单向分析。结果:在3个区域的ADC值中,P级小于025的P级别有统计学意义(F [2,297] = 168.039,P <= .001),CI的不重叠地区:正常大脑(平均值[m] = .847,标准偏差[SD] = .103,95%CI:.825-。866),梗塞(M = .533,SD = .157,95%CI: .501-。563)和Penumbra(M = .764,SD = .110,95%CI:.740-。787)。结论:ADC值可用作急性行程特异性人群中的参考数据; CIS将提供放射科医生和临床医生,并具有额外的定量工具来评估Penumbra,梗死和正常的脑组织,并为所选患者定制随访和治疗方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号