...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >EVALUATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN AND A NOVEL BASKETBALL MOBILITY TEST AS AN INJURY PREDICTION TOOL FOR COLLEGIATE BASKETBALL PLAYERS
【24h】

EVALUATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN AND A NOVEL BASKETBALL MOBILITY TEST AS AN INJURY PREDICTION TOOL FOR COLLEGIATE BASKETBALL PLAYERS

机译:函数运动筛和新型篮球流动试验作为大学篮球运动员伤害预测工具的评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Identifying injury risk and implementing preventive measures can assist in reducing injury occurrence and may ultimately improve athletic performance. Improper movement patterns often contribute to musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries. The validity of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) as an injury prediction tool for athletes remains unclear. We designed the Basketball-Specific Mobility Test (BMT) to represent the neuromuscular demands of basketball and identify deficiencies that may be indicative of greater MSK injury risk while playing this sport. The aim of this study was to examine the association of FMS and BMT scores with injury occurrence in collegiate basketball players. We hypothesized that the BMT would be a better predictor of injury risk than the FMS, and that scores from both tests would have a higher association with severe MSK injuries than minor, non-MSK injuries. One-hundred nineteen male and female collegiate basketball players from 4 Upper Midwest universities were assessed preseason (PRE) and postseason (POST) using the FMS and BMT. In-season injury records were collected from the schools' athletic trainers and were classified by type and severity. During the season, 56 of 119 players were injured, resulting in 96 total injuries. Injured athletes' PRE FMS scores demonstrated negligible effects compared with uninjured athletes' PRE scores (d 0.20). Although specificity of the FMS and BMT to predict injury was relatively high (FMS 85.7-87.6; BMT 42.0-88.0), sensitivity (FMS 14.2-22.7; BMT 11.6-39.1), odds ratios (FMS 1.00-2.08; BMT 0.47-1.06), and injury prediction capacities (area under the curve; FMS 0.43-0.49; BMT 0.49-0.59) of the tests were low. Although the FMS and BMT may be suitable for identifying MSK deficiencies, they do not accurately determine injury risk in collegiate basketball players. Injury risk assessments may be improved by targeting specific injury mechanisms and the conditions in which they occur.
机译:确定伤害风险和实施预防措施可以帮助降低伤害发生,并最终提高运动表现。不正当的运动模式通常有助于肌肉骨骼(MSK)伤害。功能运动屏(FMS)作为运动员伤害预测工具的有效性仍不清楚。我们设计了篮球特异性移动试验(BMT),代表篮球的神经肌肉需求,并确定在扮演这项运动时可能表明更大的MSK伤害风险的缺陷。本研究的目的是审查联合国篮球运动员伤害发生的FMS和BMT分数。我们假设BMT将是伤害风险的更好预测因素,而且两种测试的得分都比未成年人,非MSK伤害严重的MSK损伤更高。来自4名中西部大学的一百十九名男女大学篮球运动员使用FMS和BMT评估季前赛(PRE)和季后赛(帖子)。从学校的运动培训师收集季节性伤害记录,并按类型和严重程度分类。在本赛季,有56名119名球员受伤,导致96个伤害总伤害。受伤运动员的PRE FMS分数与未获性运动员的前评分相比,效果可忽略不计(D 0.20)。虽然FMS和BMT的特异性预测损伤相对较高(FMS 85.7-87.6; BMT 42.0-88.0),灵敏度(FMS14.22.7; BMT 11.6-39.1),差距比率(FMS 1.00-2.08; BMT 0.47-1.08 )和损伤预测能力(曲线下的区域; FMS 0.43-0.49; BMT 0.49-0.59)的试验均低。虽然FMS和BMT可能适用于识别MSK缺陷,但它们不能准确地确定大学篮球运动员的伤害风险。通过针对特定的伤害机制和它们发生的条件,可以提高伤害风险评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号