首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >VOLUME LOAD AND NEUROMUSCULAR FATIGUE DURING AN ACUTE BOUT OF AGONIST-ANTAGONIST PAIRED-SET VS. TRADITIONAL-SET TRAINING
【24h】

VOLUME LOAD AND NEUROMUSCULAR FATIGUE DURING AN ACUTE BOUT OF AGONIST-ANTAGONIST PAIRED-SET VS. TRADITIONAL-SET TRAINING

机译:在急性回合的激动剂 - 拮抗剂配对型与术期间的体积载荷和神经肌肉疲劳 传统培训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Paz, GA, Robbins, DW, de Oliveira, CG, Bottaro, M, and Miranda, H. Volume load and neuromuscular fatigue during an acute bout of agonist-antagonist paired-set vs. traditionalset training. J Strength Cond Res 31(10): 2777-2784, 2017-The purpose of this study was to investigate the acute effects of performing paired-set (PS) vs. traditional-set (TS) training over 3 consecutive sets, on volume load and electromyographic fatigue parameters of the latissimus dorsi, biceps brachii, pectoralis major, and triceps brachii muscles. Fifteen trained men performed 2 testing protocols (TS and PS) using 10 repetition maximum loads. The TS protocol consisted of 3 sets of bench press (BP) followed by 3 sets of wide-grip seated row (SR). The PS consisted of 3 sets of BP and 3 sets of SR performed in an alternating manner. Volume load was calculated as load x repetitions. The electromyographic signal, time (C-RMS) and frequency (Cf5) domain, parameters were recorded during SR. Under the PS protocol, sets of SR were performed immediately after the sets of BP. A 2-minute rest interval between the completion of the set of SR and the subsequent set of BP was implemented (e. g., between PSs). Under the TS protocol, 2-minute rest intervals were implemented between all sets. BP and SR volume loads decreased significantly from set 1 to set 2 and from set 2 to set 3 under both conditions. Volume load was greater for all sets of both exercises under PS as compared with TS. Muscle fatigue indices were greater under PS as compared with TS. In general, these results indicate that as compared with TS, PS produced a greater training volume in less time and may induce greater fatigue and thereby provide an enhanced training stimulus.
机译:PAZ,GA,ROBBINS,DW,DE Oliveira,CG,Bottaro,M和Miranda,H.体积载荷和神经肌肉疲劳期间的急性痛苦 - 拮抗剂配对套装VS. Transionalset训练。 J强度COND RES 31(10):2017年 - 本研究的目的是研究执行配对(PS)与传统集合(TS)培训的急性效果在3份连续套装上进行培训Latissimus Dorsi,二头肌Brachii,Pectoralis Major和Triceps Brachii肌肉的负载和肌电疲劳参数。 15训练的人使用10个重复最大负载进行2个测试协议(TS和PS)。 TS协议由3组台式压力机(BP)组成,后跟3套宽抓地座排(SR)。 PS由3组BP和3组SR组成,以交替方式进行。体积负载计算为负载X重复。在SR期间记录了电拍摄信号,时间(C-RMS)和频率(CF5)参数。在PS协议下,在BP集合之后立即进行SR组。实施SR集合和随后的BP集合之间的2分钟休息间隔(例如,PSS之间)。在TS协议下,在所有集合之间实现了2分钟的休息间隔。在两个条件下,BP和Sr音量负载从Set 1到Set 2和Set 2设置为3.与TS相比,PS根据PS下的所有练习的体积负载更大。与TS相比,肌肉疲劳指数在PS下较大。通常,这些结果表明,与TS相比,PS在更少的时间内产生更大的训练体积,并且可能引起更大的疲劳,从而提供增强的训练刺激。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号