...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >THE 30-15 INTERMITTENT FITNESS TEST: CAN IT PREDICT OUTCOMES IN FIELD TESTS OF ANAEROBIC PERFORMANCE?
【24h】

THE 30-15 INTERMITTENT FITNESS TEST: CAN IT PREDICT OUTCOMES IN FIELD TESTS OF ANAEROBIC PERFORMANCE?

机译:30-15间歇性健身测试:它可以预测厌氧性能的现场测试中的结果吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Scott, BR, Hodson, JA, Govus, AD, and Dascombe, BJ. The 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test: can it predict outcomes in field tests of anaerobic performance? J Strength Cond Res 31(10): 2825-2831, 2017-This study determined whether a composite assessment of intermittent fitness could be used to quantify performance in several anaerobic tasks. Fifty-two male recreational athletes (age: 24.3 +/- 4.4 years; body mass: 85.1 +/- 12.2 kg; height: 180.5 +/- 7.0 cm) were recruited from various team sports. Participants completed a battery of field tests to assess sprinting speed (40-m sprint), acceleration ability (10-m sprint), change of direction speed (505 test), anaerobic capacity (300-m shuttle), lowerbody power (vertical jump), and repeated-sprint ability and the 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test to determine the velocity of intermittent fitness (V-IFT). Relationships between anaerobic tests and V-IFT were quantified via Pearson productmoment correlations, and a 2-predictor model multiple linear regression estimated the predictive relationships between the exercise tests and the V-IFT. Multiple linear regression showed that V-IFT significantly predicted 56, 51, 44, 36, 12, and 1% of the variance in the 300-m shuttle, repeated sprint, 505- and 40-m sprint, vertical jump, and 10-m sprint tests, respectively. The 2-predictor model determined the 300-m shuttle, and repeated-sprint performance accounted for 67% of the variance in V-IFT. These findings highlight that various anaerobic characteristics contribute to the intermittent fitness qualities that are quantified through V-IFT. More specifically, these data indicate that V-IFT is useful for tracking performance in tasks largely determined by anaerobic capac-ity, but may not be a good predictor of brief all-out sprinting and jumping efforts.
机译:斯科特,布雷斯,霍森,贾,家长,广告和达斯康普,BJ。 30-15间歇性健身测试:它可以预测厌氧性能的现场测试中的结果吗? J强度COND RES 31(10):2825-2831,2825-2831,2825---本研究确定了对间歇性健身的复合评估是否可用于量化几种厌氧任务中的性能。五十二名男性休闲运动员(年龄:24.3 +/- 4.4岁;体重:85.1 +/- 12.2公斤;高度:180.5 +/- 7.0厘米)从各种团队运动中招募。参与者完成了电池的现场测试,以评估短跑速度(40米冲刺),加速度(10-M Sprint),方向速度的变化(505次),厌氧容量(300米班车),低级电源(垂直跳跃)和反复冲刺能力和30-15间歇性健康测试,以确定间歇性健身(V-IFT)的速度。通过Pearson产品的相关性量化厌氧测试和V-IFT之间的关系,并且通过Pearson Produmment相关性量化了2-Predictor模型多元线性回归估计了运动测试和V-IFT之间的预测关系。多元线性回归显示V-IFT显着预测56,51,44,36,12和300米班车,重复冲刺,505-和40M冲刺,垂直跳跃和10-的1%的1% M Sprint测试分别。 2-Predictor模型确定了300米的班车,并重复冲刺性能占V-IFT方差的67%。这些发现强调,各种厌氧特性有助于通过V-IFT量化的间歇性健身品质。更具体地说,这些数据表明V-IFT可用于跟踪大部分由Anaerobic CALETY决定的任务的性能,但可能不是简要全息冲刺和跳跃努力的良好预测因子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号