...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN THE ACCURACY OF ESTIMATING TARGET FORCE USING PERCENTAGES OF MAXIMAL VOLUNTARY ISOMETRIC CONTRACTIONS VS. RATINGS OF PERCEIVED EXERTION DURING ISOMETRIC MUSCLE ACTIONS
【24h】

SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN THE ACCURACY OF ESTIMATING TARGET FORCE USING PERCENTAGES OF MAXIMAL VOLUNTARY ISOMETRIC CONTRACTIONS VS. RATINGS OF PERCEIVED EXERTION DURING ISOMETRIC MUSCLE ACTIONS

机译:性别相关的差异估算目标力的准确性,使用最大自愿等距收缩与百分比与百分比与 在等距肌动作期间感知劳动的评级

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine sex-related differences in the accuracy of estimating actual target force and to compare the accuracy of estimating actual target force using percentages of maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) or ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) values during isometric leg flexion and leg extension muscle actions. Twenty adults, 10 women and 10 men, (mean +/- SD age: 22.9 +/- 2.9 years) completed pretest MVICs to calculate actual target force values at 10, 30, 50, 70, and 90% of MVIC. Additional trials were then randomized for estimating actual target force using percentages of MVIC or RPE values during isometric leg flexion or leg extension. For isometric leg flexion, the women and men overestimated (p = 0.05) the actual target force at 10% for the percentage of MVIC and RPE trials and underestimated the actual target force at 90% for the RPE trial. For isometric leg extension, the women overestimated the actual target force at 10% for the percentage of MVIC trial and RPE trial. The men overestimated actual target force at 10 and 30% for the percentage of MVIC trial and overestimated actual target force at 10% during the RPE trial for isometric leg extension. Also, the men underestimated actual target force at 90% for both the percentage of MVIC trial and RPE trial. Men require more familiarization than women to accurately estimate isometric leg extension force values. Caution should be used when estimating force production as a percentage of MVIC or RPE value for training prescriptions.
机译:本研究的目的是检查性别相关的差异,以估计实际目标力的准确性,并使用最大自愿等距收缩(MVIC)的百分比或感知劳动(RPE)值的额定值来比较估计实际目标力的准确性等距腿部屈曲和腿部延伸肌动作。 20名成年人,10名女性和10名男子(平均+/- SD:22.9 +/- 2.9岁)完成预先测试的MVICS,以计算10,30,50,70和90%的MVIC的实际目标力量值。然后随机试验,用于估计在等距腿部屈曲或腿部伸展期间使用MVIC或RPE值的百分比来估计实际目标力。对于等距腿部屈曲,妇女和男性高估(P& = 0.05),对于MVIC和RPE试验的百分比,实际目标力量为10%,并低估了RPE试验的90%的实际目标力量。对于等距腿部延伸,妇女为MVIC试验和RPE试验的百分比估计了10%的实际目标力量。在RPE试验期间,在10%的等距腿部延伸期间,人们在10%的百分比下高估了10%和30%的实际目标力量。此外,对于MVIC试验和RPE试验的百分比,男性低估了90%的实际目标力量。男性需要比妇女更熟悉,以准确估计等距腿延长力值。应在估算力产量作为培训处方的MVIC或RPE值的百分比时使用注意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号