首页> 外文期刊>Journal of sleep research >Definition of excessive daytime sleepiness in the general population: Feeling sleepy relates better to sleep‐related symptoms and quality of life than the Epworth Sleepiness Scale score. Results from an epidemiological study
【24h】

Definition of excessive daytime sleepiness in the general population: Feeling sleepy relates better to sleep‐related symptoms and quality of life than the Epworth Sleepiness Scale score. Results from an epidemiological study

机译:一般人群中过度嗜睡的定义:感觉困比睡眠相关的症状和生活质量更好,而不是欧洲呼吸困倦比例得分。 流行病学研究结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Many different subjective tools are being used to measure excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) but the most widely used is the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). However, it is unclear if using the ESS is adequate on its own when assessing EDS. The aim of this study was to estimate the characteristics and prevalence of EDS using the ESS and the Basic Nordic Sleep Questionnaire (BNSQ) in general population samples. Participants aged 40?years and older answered questions about sleepiness, health, sleep‐related symptoms and quality of life. Two groups were defined as suffering from EDS: those who scored 10 on the ESS (with increased risk of dozing off) and those reporting feeling sleepy during the day ≥3 times per week on the BNSQ. In total, 1,338 subjects (53% male, 74.1% response rate) participated, 13.1% reported an increased risk of dozing off, 23.2% reported feeling sleepy and 6.4% reported both. The prevalence of restless leg syndrome, nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux, difficulties initiating and maintaining sleep and nocturnal sweating was higher among subjects reporting feeling sleepy compared to non‐sleepy subjects. Also, subjects reporting feeling sleepy had poorer quality of life and reported more often feeling unrested during the day than non‐sleepy subjects. However, subjects reporting increased risk of dozing off (ESS??10) without feeling sleepy had a similar symptom profile as the non‐sleepy subjects. Therefore, reporting only risk of dozing off without feeling sleepy may not reflect problematic sleepiness and more instruments in addition to ESS are needed when evaluating daytime sleepiness.
机译:摘要许多不同的主观工具正在用于测量过度的白天嗜睡(EDS),但最广泛使用的是Epworth Sleepiness Scale(ESS)。但是,如果在评估EDS时,则目前尚不清楚使用该ESS是充分的。本研究的目的是估计ESS和基本北欧睡眠问卷(BNSQ)的EDS的特征和患病率在一般人群样本中。 40岁的参与者历史悠久的回答了关于嗜睡,健康,睡眠相关症状和生活质量的问题。两组被定义为患有EDS:那些在ESS上划分的人(随着拟订的风险增加)和那些在BNSQ每周每天≥3次困倦的报告。总共有1,338名受试者(男性为53%,74.1%的响应率)参加,13.1%报告拟订的风险增加,23.2%报告的感觉困扰和6.4%报告。与非困扰的受试者相比,躁动腿综合征,夜间胃痛反症,夜间胃痛反流,难以启动和维持睡眠和夜间出汗的患病率较高。此外,报告感觉困倦的受试者的生活质量较差,并且在非昏昏欲睡的主题时据报道更多地感觉不安。然而,主题报告偶然的风险增加(ESS?&?10)没有感到困倦与非困科目有类似的症状概况。因此,报告只有在没有感到困倦的情况下,在没有感觉困倦时的风险可能不会反映出问题睡眠,并且在评估白天嗜睡时需要更多的乐器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号