【24h】

Electrodermal Presentiments of Future Emotions

机译:未来情绪的电墓展示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In previously reported double-blind experiments, electrodermal activity (EDA) monitored during display of randomly selected photographs showed that EDA was higher before emotional photos than before calm photos (p = 0.002). This differential effect, suggestive of precognition, was dubbed "presentiment." Three new double-blind experiments were conducted in an attempt to replicate the original studies using the same basic design, but with new physiological monitoring hardware, software, stimulus photos, subject populations, and testing environments. The three replications involved 109 participants who together contributed 3,709 trials. The new studies again showed higher EDA before emotional photos than before calm photos (p = 0.001). All four experiments combined involved 133 participants and 4,569 trials; the associated weighted mean effect size (per trial) was e = 0.064 ± 0.015, over 4 standard errors from a null effect. As a more general test, presentiment predicts a positive correlation between pre-stimulus EDA and independently assessed emotionality ratings of the photo targets. The observed correlation across all four experiments was significantly positive (p = 0.008). Consideration of alternative explanations, including expectation, sensory cues, hardware or software artifacts, inappropriate analyses, and anticipatory strategies, revealed no suitable candidates that could systematically generate the observed results. This series of four experiments, supported by successful replications conducted by other investigators, appears to demonstrate a small magnitude but statistically robust form of precognition in the human autonomic nervous system.
机译:在先前报道的双盲实验中,在随机选择的照片显示期间监测的电肥能量(EDA)显示,在情绪照片之前的射线比平静照片之前更高(P = 0.002)。这种差异效果,暗示预知,被称为“展示”。进行了三项新的双盲实验,试图使用相同的基本设计进行复制,但具有新的生理监测硬件,软件,刺激照片,主题群体和测试环境。三项重复涉及109名参与者,他们一起贡献了3,709次试验。在情绪照片之前,新的研究再次在平静照片之前显示出更高的EDA(P = 0.001)。所有四个实验组合涉及133名参与者和4,569项试验;相关的加权平均效应大小(每次试验)为E = 0.064±0.015,来自零效应的4个标准误差。作为一种更一般的测试,陈列望预测刺激前刺激前的正相关性,并且独立评估了照片靶标的情感评级。所有四个实验的观察到的相关性显着阳性(p = 0.008)。审议替代解释,包括期望,感官提示,硬件或软件工件,不恰当的分析和预期策略,揭示了没有合适的候选人,可以系统地产生观察结果。通过其他调查人员进行的成功复制支持的这一系列的四种实验似乎在人类自主神经系统中表现出一种小小的数量,但统计学鲁棒形式的预知。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号