首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Studies >Money talk: How relations between farmers and advisors around financial management are shaped
【24h】

Money talk: How relations between farmers and advisors around financial management are shaped

机译:钱谈:农民与财务管理周围的顾问之间的关系是如何塑造的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The nature of interactions between farmers and advisors is the focus of a growing body of research. While many studies explore the potential role of advisors in facilitating farmers' practice change in practices related to agricultural production such as soil, water, pest and animal health management, studies that specifically investigate how advisors support farmers with financial management (FM) are limited. The contribution this paper makes is to identify who farmers' FM advisors are and to shed light on how fanner-advisor interactions about FM are shaped. Semi-structured interviews with both farmers and a range of advisors (bankers, accountants, farm management consultants, specialist financial advisors and industry funded advisors) were conducted. The main findings are that farm financial information and FM are considered to be sensitive topics and being good at FM is not central to farmers' identity (relative to e.g. production management). Due to the sensitivity and taboo around the topic and the low level of interest in FM, most farmers do not actively seek to acquire financial advice. Farmers most openly discuss FM with their banker and accountant and some seek advice from farm management consultants. Advice seeking from other advisors was limited. Theoretical implications are that FM as a topic of advice introduces unique dynamics to interactions between farmer and advisor, which highlights the importance of better consideration of taboo and sensitive topics in advisory interactions. Furthermore, the findings on how the bankers' authority impacts on the advisory relationship with farmers indicated that issues of power in view of such authoritative advisory relationships need to be better considered. To enhance effective provisioning on FM advice, policy could focus on improving the match between demand and supply, and help create awareness about the importance of discussing FM to reduce the sensitivity of the topic.
机译:农民与顾问之间的互动性质是越来越多的研究的重点。虽然许多研究探讨了顾问在促进农民实践变化方面的潜在作用,这些实践与农业生产有关的实践,如土壤,水,害虫和动物健康管理,专门调查顾问如何支持财务管理(FM)的顾问如何有限。本文的贡献是识别农民的FM顾问是谁以及揭示粉丝们的忠告者互动符合FM的互动。对农民和一系列顾问(银行,会计师,农场管理顾问,专家财务顾问和行业资助顾问)进行半结构性访谈。主要研究结果是农场财务信息和FM被认为是敏感的主题,擅长FM并不是农民身份的核心(相对于例如生产管理)。由于主题周围的敏感性和禁忌以及对FM的低兴趣,大多数农民都没有积极寻求获得财务建议。农民最公开地与他们的银行家和会计师和农业管理顾问寻求建议。从其他顾问寻求的建议有限。理论含义是FM作为建议的主题引入了农民和顾问之间的互动的独特动态,这突出了更好地考虑禁忌和咨询互动中的敏感主题的重要性。此外,对银行家权威如何影响与农民的咨询关系的调查结果表明,鉴于此类权威咨询关系的权力问题需要更好地考虑。为了加强对FM建议的有效拨款,政策可以专注于改善需求和供应之间的匹配,并有助于了解讨论FM以降低主题的敏感性的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号