首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Studies >Ordering adoption: Materiality, knowledge and farmer engagement with precision agriculture technologies
【24h】

Ordering adoption: Materiality, knowledge and farmer engagement with precision agriculture technologies

机译:订购采用:唯物,知识和农民与精密农业技术的订婚

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In their efforts to understand why and how farmers adopt new technologies, techniques and programmes, rural sociologists and geographers have typically focused on the social and cultural relations in which farming knowledge and practices are embedded. However, limited scholarly attention has been given to the important ways in which materials and materiality are a constitutive element in how farmers come to know and engage with technology. This paper addresses this issue through the application of theoretical work on ordering, which focuses on the materially heterogeneous processes and implicit strategies that hold together and perform particular social and organisational arrangements. Drawing upon qualitative data from a research project on adoption of precision agriculture (PA) in the Australian rice industry, we identify two principal modes of ordering: (1)commercial-technological,in which lack of compatibility between technologies produced by different machinery manufacturers creates challenges for farmers in integrating and adapting PA to existing farming practices and systems; and (2)biophysical, where drought and low water allocations create uncertainty and a reluctance by farmers to make large capital outlays for PA technology. While these modes of ordering constrain rice growers’ capacities to adopt PA technology, we argue that growers also engage in their own alternative ordering practices to negotiate, work with, and work around these constraints. We refer to this work astinkeringand argue that it is a powerful, yet little recognised, form of ordering enabling growers to take advantage of the material benefits of PA in a way that is flexible, adaptable, and fits their immediate farming circumstances. In concluding, we contend that an ordering approach provides a fruitful way forward in recognising the more-than-cultural dimensions through which farmers engage with technology, and particularly the complex ways in which materiality intertwines with, shapes, and is shaped by, farming knowledge and practices.Highlights?Materiality is a constitutive element in how farmers come to know and engage with technology.?A focus on ordering enables recognition of how materially heterogeneous processes intertwine with farming knowledge.?Commercial-technological and biophysical modes of ordering impose constraints on precision agriculture (PA) implementation.?Growers engage in alternative ordering practices, referred to astinkering, to work with, and around, these constraints.?Tinkering enables growers to take advantage of PA in a way that is flexible and accords with their farming circumstances.
机译:在他们努力了解为什么和农民如何采用新技术,技术和方案,农村社会学家和地理学家通常专注于嵌入农业知识和习俗的社会和文化关系。然而,有限的学术关注已经提出了材料和唯物性是农民如何了解和与技术啮合的构成要素的重要方法。本文通过在订购的理论工作中的应用中解决了这个问题,这侧重于具有持有的物质异构过程和隐性策略,并进行特定的社会和组织安排。从澳大利亚水稻行业采用精密农业(PA)采用的研究项目的定性数据,我们确定了两种原则:(1)商业技术,其中不同机械制造商生产的技术之间缺乏兼容性农民在整合和适应现有农业实践和系统方面的挑战; (2)生物物理,干旱和低水分划分产生不确定性和农民不愿意为PA技术进行大量资本支出。虽然这些订购水稻种植者的能力采用PA技术的这些方式,但我们认为种植者也从事自己的替代订购实践来谈判,与之处理和围绕这些限制工作。我们参考这项工作astinkeringand,争辩说这是一个强大的,但很少认识的是订购的形式,使种植者能够以灵活,适应性和适合其直接养殖的方式利用PA的材料益处。在结束时,我们认为订购方法提供了一种富有成效的方向,以认识到农民与技术的更多文化维度,特别是唯物于与形状的复杂方式,以及耕种知识和实践。实践精确农业(PA)实施.?growers参与替代订购实践,提到令人震惊,与周围一起使用这些限制.?Tinkering使种植者能够以灵活性和符合其养殖环境的方式利用PA。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号