首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Studies >Framing sustainability: Alternative standards schemes for sustainable palm oil and South-South trade
【24h】

Framing sustainability: Alternative standards schemes for sustainable palm oil and South-South trade

机译:框架可持续性:可持续棕榈油和南北贸易的替代标准计划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Agri-food sustainability standards developed through multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) are an increasingly prominent form of governance that seeks to enhance participation by a broader range of stakeholders in defining and implementing sustainable agricultural practices. However, they have been characterised by social scientists as largely depoliticising and marginalising in their effects, leading to responses from stakeholder groups such as contestation, compromises and attempts to 'ratchet-up' existing standards. In this paper, we consider a response to MSI-developed sustainability standards that has been given limited attention in the literature to date the development of alternative standards schemes and the framing of sustainability in the context of South-South trade relationships. Through a focus on the Indonesian and Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil schemes (ISPO and MSPO), we apply Callon's writing on 'framing' to highlight how these schemes provide a response to the perceived stringent framing of sustainable palm oil in the Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil standards. Our analysis shows that the ISPO and MSPO are important in the creation of alternative frames for including smallholders who may not have the capacities or resources to participate in the RSPO. More significantly, the ISPO and MSPO provide a way of reframing sustainable palm oil that enables the palm oil sector in Indonesia and Malaysia to bypass the perceived challenges of RSPO certification and to balance existing price-based demands from their main export markets of India and China with future prospective sustainability demands in those markets. The paper concludes by arguing that sustainability schemes geared towards markets in the Global South need to be given greater scrutiny in terms of how they: (a) address the exclusion generated by MSI-developed certification schemes, and (b) reframe sustainability in ways that meet the current and emerging market requirements in South-South trade.
机译:通过多利益相关方举措(MSIS)制定的农业粮食可持续性标准是一种日益突出的治理形式,寻求通过更广泛的利益相关者在定义和实施可持续的农业惯例方面加强参与。然而,他们的特点是社会科学家,在很大程度上是在很大程度上代理和边缘化的影响,导致利益相关者团体(如争议,妥协和试图“驾驭”现有标准)的响应。在本文中,我们考虑了对MSI开发的可持续性标准的回应,这些标准在文献中迄今为止在文献中受到限制,以显示南北贸易关系的背景下的可持续性框架。通过重点关注印度尼西亚和马来西亚可持续棕榈油计划(ISPO和MSPO),我们将Callon写作“框架”写作,突出这些计划如何为可持续棕榈油圆桌会议中可持续棕榈油的感知严格框架提供回应标准。我们的分析表明,ISPO和MSPO在为包括可能没有能力或资源参与RSPO的小企业的替代框架中很重要。更重要的是,ISPO和MSPO提供了一种恢复可持续棕榈油的方式,使印度尼西亚和马来西亚的棕榈油部门能够绕过RSPO认证的感知挑战,并从印度和中国的主要出口市场平衡现有的价格需求这些市场未来的未来可持续性需求。本文通过争辩说,在全球南部市场的可持续性计划需要更大的审查:(a)以MSI-SDRESS认证计划而产生的排除,(b)以途径更具资格符合南北贸易的当前和新兴市场要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号