...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Dermatopathology >CD99 Expression in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and dermatofibroma
【24h】

CD99 Expression in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and dermatofibroma

机译:CD99在隆突性皮肤纤维肉瘤和皮肤纤维瘤中的表达

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND:: Differentiating between dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) and hypercellular dermatofibroma (DF) can sometimes be challenging, and a panel of immunostains is often employed. Expression of conventional markers oftentimes overlaps. We evaluated CD99 expression in DFSP and DF and its utility in distinction between these 2 entities. METHODS:: CD99 immunostaining was performed on 34 DFSPs and 24 hypercellular DFs. The intensity of staining was graded as "weak," "moderate," or "strong," and the proportion of positive cells was graded as follows: "scattered" when individual cells comprised <5% of the total cellularity of the lesion; "focal" with >5% but <25% of the cells; or "diffusely distributed" with staining of >25% of lesional spindle cells. RESULTS:: Overall, DFSPs showed positive CD99 staining in 21 (61.76%) cases. Moderate and weak patterns of staining were the most frequent, seen in 13 (38.2%) and 7 (20.6%) cases, respectively. CD99 staining in DFSPs was predominantly scattered or patchy (4 and 11 lesions respectively) with less than 25% of cells expressing CD99. In comparison, all 24 DF cases showed strong CD99 positivity in >25% of the spindle cell component (P = 0.0003). The most striking difference related to the distribution of staining. In DFSP, tumor cells in the superficial dermis, when present, were always CD99 negative. In contrast, DF cells in the superficial dermis always demonstrated strong CD99 positivity. CONCLUSIONS:: DF strongly expresses CD99 in a diffuse pattern that may serve as evidence in distinction from DFSP. As the differences in staining were most pronounced in the superficial portions of the tumor, CD99 staining may be well suited to superficial biopsy specimens, where distinction in hematoxylin and eosin sections may be most problematic.
机译:背景:区分隆突性皮肤皮肤肉瘤(DFSP)和高细胞性皮肤纤维瘤(DF)有时可能具有挑战性,并且经常使用一组免疫染色。常规标记的表达经常重叠。我们评估了DFSP和DF中CD99的表达及其在这两个实体之间的区别。方法:对34个DFSP和24个高细胞DF进行了CD99免疫染色。染色强度分级为“弱”,“中度”或“强”,阳性细胞的比例分级如下:“分散”是指单个细胞占病变总细胞率的<5%。 “焦点”细胞> 5%但<25%;或“弥散分布”,且病变梭形细胞染色> 25%。结果:总的来说,DFSPs在21例(61.76%)病例中显示出CD99阳性。中度和弱度染色模式最常见,分别在13(38.2%)和7(20.6%)例中可见。 DFSP中的CD99染色主要是分散的或不完整的(分别为4和11个病灶),少于25%的细胞表达CD99。相比之下,所有24例DF病例在大于25%的梭形细胞成分中均表现出较强的CD99阳性(P = 0.0003)。最显着的差异与染色的分布有关。在DFSP中,浅表真皮中的肿瘤细胞(如果存在)总是CD99阴性。相反,浅表真皮中的DF细胞始终表现出较强的CD99阳性。结论:DF以弥散模式强烈表达CD99,这可能是与DFSP区别的证据。由于染色的差异在肿瘤的浅表部分最为明显,因此CD99染色可能非常适合浅表活检标本,在这些标本中,苏木精和曙红切片的区分可能是最有问题的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号