首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychosomatic research >DSM-5 illness anxiety disorder and somatic symptom disorder: Comorbidity, correlates, and overlap with DSM-IV hypochondriasis
【24h】

DSM-5 illness anxiety disorder and somatic symptom disorder: Comorbidity, correlates, and overlap with DSM-IV hypochondriasis

机译:DSM-5疾病焦虑症和躯体症状障碍:合并症,相关性和与DSM-IV次闭症重叠

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Objective To investigate the reliability, validity and utility of DSM-5 illness anxiety disorder (IAD) and somatic symptom disorder (SSD), and explore their overlap with DSM-IV Hypochondriasis in a health anxious sample. Methods Treatment-seeking patients with health anxiety (N = 118) completed structured diagnostic interviews to assess DSM-IV Hypochondriasis, DSM-5 IAD, SSD, and comorbid mental disorders, and completed self-report measures of health anxiety, comorbid symptoms, cognitions and behaviours, and service utilization. Results IAD and SSD were more reliable diagnoses than Hypochondriasis (kappa estimates: IAD: 0.80, SSD: 0.92, Hypochondriasis: 0.60). 45% of patients were diagnosed with SSD, 47% with IAD, and 8% with comorbid IAD/SSD. Most patients with IAD fluctuated between seeking and avoiding care (61%), whereas care-seeking (25%) and care-avoidant subtypes were less common (14%). Half the sample met criteria for DSM-IV Hypochondriasis; of those, 56% met criteria for SSD criteria, 36% for IAD, and 8% for comorbid IAD/SSD. Compared to IAD, SSD was characterized by more severe health anxiety, somatic symptoms, depression, and higher health service use, and higher rates of major depressive disorder, panic disorder and agoraphobia. Conclusions DSM-5 IAD and SSD classifications reliably detect more cases of clinically significant health anxiety than DSM-IV Hypochondriasis. The differences between IAD and SSD appear to be due to severity. Future research should explore the generalizability of these findings to other samples, and whether diagnostic status predicts treatment response and long-term outcome. Highlights ? Assessed reliability, validity and clinical utility of DSM-5 IAD and SSD diagnoses ? DSM-5 IAD and SSD identified more cases than DSM-IV Hypochondriasis. ? IAD was more similar than different to SSD in a health anxious sample. ? DSM-5 IAD and SSD diagnoses were more reliable than Hypochondriasis.
机译:摘要目的探讨DSM-5疾病焦虑症(IAD)和躯体症状障碍(SSD)的可靠性,有效性和效用,并在健康焦急样品中探讨其与DSM-IV次闭虫的重叠。方法治疗健康焦虑的治疗患者(n = 118)完成了结构化诊断访谈,以评估DSM-IV次闭症,DSM-5 IAD,SSD和融合精神障碍,并完成了自我报告的健康焦虑措施,合并症症状,认知和行为和服务利用率。结果IAD和SSD诊断比次粒度更可靠(Kappa估计数:IAD:0.80,SSD:0.92,次闭合:0.60)。 45%的患者被诊断为SSD,47%,IAD,8%的合并IAD / SSD。大多数IAD的患者在寻求和避免护理(61%)之间波动(61%),而追求(25%)和护理避税亚型不太常见(14%)。样本的一半次闭次闭孔的标准;其中,56%的SSD标准标准,IAD的36%,合并IAD / SSD为8%。与IAD相比,SSD的特点是更严重的健康焦虑,体细胞症状,抑郁症和更高的卫生服务使用,以及更高的主要抑郁症,恐慌症和广播恐怖症率。结论DSM-5 IAD和SSD分类可靠地检测更多的临床显着的健康焦虑病例,而不是DSM-IV次闭症。 IAD和SSD之间的差异似乎是由于严重程度。未来的研究应该探讨这些发现对其他样本的普遍性,以及诊断状况是否预测治疗反应和长期结果。强调 ? DSM-5 IAD和SSD诊断的评估可靠性,有效性和临床效用? DSM-5 IAD和SSD鉴定了比DSM-IV次闭虫更多的病例。还在健康焦急样品中,IAD比SSD更相似。还DSM-5 IAD和SSD诊断比次粒子病毒更可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号